15.06.2013 Views

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FDI-Foreign Direct Investment (in million USD)<br />

Time period - 2000-2007<br />

Source: EBRD<br />

Standard error in parenthesis<br />

70<br />

2<br />

t1= -1,477; t2= 2,040; F= 4,164; R = 0,51;<br />

α = 0,<br />

01<br />

In order to understand the link between FDI and employment, it is inevitable<br />

to explore the determinants of FDI, i.e. weather they have been market, resource or<br />

efficiency seeking. Most of the greenfield FDI inflows in Western Balkan<br />

economies have been resource and efficiency seeking. However, the low impact<br />

of foreign capital on employment is a result to the FDI pattern, being part of the<br />

process of privatization in the form of mergers and acquisitions. The level of<br />

greenfield investment have so far played an episodic role.<br />

Concluding remarks<br />

The paper addresses the influence of the foreign capital inflows on the<br />

achieved growth rates, export performances and employment in the Western<br />

Balkan economies. The impact of foreign investment on growth and employment<br />

has been lower than expected. This can be explained by the pattern and sector<br />

structure of the investment. Services experienced a surge in FDI inflow as a<br />

consequence of deregulation and came in the form of mergers and acquisitions as a<br />

result of the privatization of state-owned enterprises. The remaining part of FDI<br />

mainly went to transport infrastructure and low value added manufacturing<br />

industries.<br />

Countries with relatively underdeveloped financial markets and weak<br />

institutions tend to depend more on FDI compared to countries with bigger<br />

financial markets and better institutions. The value of foreign portfolio investment<br />

in the region is insignificant due to the underdeveloped financial markets. All<br />

economies in the region have not still built strong institutions and experience<br />

shallow and volatile financial markets. Generally, the portfolio flows in the<br />

transition countries have weak direct effect on domestic investment since the<br />

foreign investors seem to be led by diversification goals. In terms of the<br />

consequences of capital account liberalization, the transition economies, as well as<br />

the counties in the region, replicate the developing countries pattern. The Western<br />

Balkans countries face relative price adjustments beyond the Balassa-Samuelson<br />

effect because of their ongoing structural reforms and liberalization in such areas as<br />

telecommunications, energy, transportation, and health care.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!