22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 Terence Parsons<br />

Every A is B Every A is every B<br />

No A is B No A is every B<br />

Some A is B Some A is every B<br />

Some A is not B Some A is not every B<br />

Using William’s equipollences toge<strong>the</strong>r with double negation, every proposition in<br />

<strong>the</strong> expanded notation is equivalent to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se eight forms.<br />

Notice that throughout this extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> what counts as a categorical<br />

proposition <strong>the</strong> quantifier signs have not been supplemented; <strong>the</strong>y are ‘every’,<br />

‘no’, and ‘some’, with <strong>the</strong> indefinite construction (which uses <strong>the</strong> indefinite article<br />

in English, and nothing at all in Latin) treated as if it is equivalent to one with<br />

‘some’.<br />

The semantics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se propositions is straightforward. We can view a categorical<br />

proposition in this form as consisting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> copula preceded by some denoting<br />

phrases and some negations, each <strong>of</strong> which has scope over what follows it. This<br />

can easily be given a logical form that is familiar to us by flanking <strong>the</strong> verb with<br />

variables, supposing that <strong>the</strong> preceding denoting phrases bind <strong>the</strong>se variables. Examples:<br />

Every donkey is an animal ⇒<br />

(Every donkey x) (an animal y) x is y<br />

Some donkey is not an animal ⇒<br />

(Some donkey x) not (an animal y) x is y<br />

Some donkey an animal is not ⇒<br />

(Some donkey x) (an animal y) not x is y<br />

No donkey is not an animal ⇒<br />

(No donkey x) not (an animal y) x is y<br />

No animal is not every donkey ⇒<br />

(No animal x) not (every donkey y) x is y<br />

It is not difficult to formulate a modern semantical <strong>the</strong>ory that would apply to<br />

<strong>the</strong> forms that occur on <strong>the</strong> last lines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se examples, provided that we keep<br />

in mind that an affirmative proposition is false when any <strong>of</strong> its main terms are<br />

empty, and a negative one is true. 15<br />

1.8 Molecular Propositions<br />

Certain combinations <strong>of</strong> categorical propositions are called hypo<strong>the</strong>tical propositions;<br />

<strong>the</strong>se include combinations that we call molecular. Their development came<br />

15 It is <strong>of</strong>ten suggested that all <strong>the</strong> Aristotelian forms can be symbolized in <strong>the</strong> monadic predicate<br />

calculus. The expansions mentioned here require <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> monadic predicate logic with<br />

identity, and require using quantifiers within <strong>the</strong> scopes <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r quantifiers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!