22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Logic</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 14 th Century after Ockham 435<br />

will be mentioned in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic sections to follow this one.<br />

1.1 Beyond Paris and Oxford<br />

What is perhaps most interesting in <strong>the</strong> historical development <strong>of</strong> logic in <strong>the</strong> 14 th<br />

century is <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> logical and philosophical knowledge to places o<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

<strong>the</strong> two traditional centers, Paris and Oxford. Indeed, even though it would be<br />

incorrect to say that Paris and Oxford were <strong>the</strong> only centers <strong>of</strong> intellectual and<br />

academic development in Christian Europe in <strong>the</strong> centuries preceding <strong>the</strong> 14 th<br />

century (<strong>the</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bologna is generally considered to be <strong>the</strong> oldest university<br />

in Christian Europe, and <strong>the</strong>re were important studia, i.e. schools <strong>of</strong> higher<br />

learning, in many European cities), it is undeniable that Oxford and especially<br />

Paris (which was <strong>the</strong> great center for <strong>the</strong>ology from <strong>the</strong> 12 th up to <strong>the</strong> 15 th century)<br />

were <strong>the</strong> two great poles <strong>of</strong> development concerning <strong>the</strong> Ars in general (i.e.<br />

logic, rhetoric, grammar, geometry, astronomy, music and arithmetic, plus <strong>the</strong><br />

three ‘philosophies’: moral philosophy, metaphysics and natural philosophy), and<br />

concerning logic in particular (cf. [De Libera, 1982], on <strong>the</strong> Paris and Oxford traditions<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 13 th century). In <strong>the</strong> 14 th century, however, especially in <strong>the</strong> second<br />

half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century, this was no longer <strong>the</strong> case.<br />

The regional element was always an important one in how academic learning<br />

was organized in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>of</strong> Paris, which was divided in ‘nations’ in such a way<br />

that it was most common for a student to study under a master originally coming<br />

from his own home region (cf. [Courtenay, 2004]). 1 But with <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> several<br />

new universities in different locations in Europe, by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 14 th century<br />

it was no longer necessary for a student to go to Paris or Oxford to obtain his<br />

degree; he could <strong>of</strong>ten stay within <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> his own country. By <strong>the</strong> same<br />

token, <strong>the</strong> two traditional centers were no longer <strong>the</strong> only places where original<br />

and influential work in philosophy and logic was being done. It may still be useful,<br />

though, for explanatory purposes, to draw a distinction between <strong>the</strong> British and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Paris traditions in logic in <strong>the</strong> 14 th century (even though <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>of</strong> course<br />

multiple points <strong>of</strong> contact and mutual influence between <strong>the</strong> two traditions), and to<br />

track how each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se traditions was exported to and reworked in new centers <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge. Indeed, even at <strong>the</strong> time this distinction was recognized: Continental<br />

authors usually referred to <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British tradition (in particular those<br />

currently referred to as <strong>the</strong> ‘Mertonians’) as ‘Anglici’or‘Britannici’ (cf. [Sylla,<br />

1982, 541]).<br />

Two interesting examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British and Parisian traditions<br />

in logic are <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> British logic in Italy and <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> Parisian<br />

logic in Eastern Europe. Take Italy, for example: even though <strong>the</strong> country already<br />

had a great tradition <strong>of</strong> institutions <strong>of</strong> knowledge, an interesting phenomenon is<br />

1 The four Parisian nations were: Normandy, Picardy, France and <strong>the</strong> English/German nation.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r universities <strong>of</strong>ten followed Paris’ example and were organized in (usually four) nations as<br />

well (but naturally, different nations o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> original Parisian ones). The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Prague, for example, was organized in <strong>the</strong> Bohemian, Bavarian, Saxon and Polish nations (see<br />

[Ashworth, 2006, 212]).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!