22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 Terence Parsons<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this section is to say how to expand <strong>the</strong> class <strong>of</strong> categorical propositions.<br />

We need to say how to treat verbs o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> copula, and subjects<br />

and predicates that are adjectives, or participles, or that are modified by relative<br />

clauses, or that are possessives, and so on.<br />

2.1 Adjectives<br />

Aristotelian logic is awkward when applied to terms that are adjectives. If you<br />

apply simple conversion to:<br />

you get<br />

Some donkey is grey<br />

Some grey is [a] donkey<br />

which is ungrammatical; a quantifier word like ‘some’ must combine with a noun,<br />

not with an adjective. This problem has a solution in Latin, in which it is possible<br />

to “substantivate” an adjective — which is to use it as a common noun with a<br />

neuter gender. The sentence:<br />

Every woman is tall<br />

contains <strong>the</strong> adjective ‘tall’ which, in Latin, would bear a singular nominative<br />

feminine inflection to agree with ‘woman’. But in this sentence:<br />

Every tall is grey (meaning ‘Every tall thing is grey’.)<br />

it is substantivated; it bears a singular nominative neuter inflection <strong>of</strong> its own,<br />

and it is grammatically a noun. So it can be treated as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regimented<br />

notation as already understood. (In this example ‘grey’ is still an adjective; it has<br />

an adjectival inflection that agrees with <strong>the</strong> gender and number <strong>of</strong> ‘tall’.)<br />

What does such a substantivated adjective supposit for? The obvious option is<br />

that substantivated ‘tall’ supposits (with respect to a time) for each thing which<br />

is tall (at that time). This is <strong>the</strong> common assumption, which is adopted here. 22<br />

In ‘ Every tall is grey ‘ <strong>the</strong> ‘grey’ would not normally be substantivated; it would<br />

remain an adjective with adjectival inflections. Presumably, it is here equivalent<br />

to its substantivated version; it supposits (with respect to a time) for each thing<br />

which is grey (at that time).<br />

2.2 Extending <strong>the</strong> Theory to Intransitive Verbs<br />

Having explained adjectives, <strong>the</strong>re is a sense in which intransitive verbs have already<br />

been accounted for. At least, <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se verbe already appear.<br />

22 Buridan SD 8.2.4 (648): “‘white [thing]’ [album], amounts to, ‘white thing’ [res alba], or<br />

‘white being’ [ens album].” In this quote ‘album’ is <strong>the</strong> substantivated version <strong>of</strong> ‘white’ and‘res<br />

alba’ means literally ‘white thing’, wherein ‘white’ is an adjective.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!