22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Logic</strong> and Theories <strong>of</strong> Meaning . . . 359<br />

Compendium studii <strong>the</strong>ologiae (1292), 58 his last, uncompleted, work. Especially<br />

<strong>the</strong> last two treatises justify a treatment <strong>of</strong> Roger Bacon’s semantics in a chapter<br />

on logic and <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> meaning in <strong>the</strong> late 13th century.<br />

Signification is usually treated as a property <strong>of</strong> words or concepts. Bacon,<br />

however, places <strong>the</strong> signification <strong>of</strong> words in a broader context <strong>of</strong> a <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong><br />

signs. In De signis as well as in <strong>the</strong> Compendium 59 Bacon gives a classification <strong>of</strong><br />

signs. In <strong>the</strong> Compendium he claims that it is original, although he admits that<br />

Augustine has a similar classification in De doctrina christiana. 60 A sign, he says<br />

in De signis, is “that which once presented to a sense faculty or intellect designates<br />

something to that intellect.” 61 This definition is similar to Augustine’s except for<br />

<strong>the</strong> fact that Bacon’s definition allows for <strong>the</strong> case where something imperceptible<br />

by a sensory faculty is a sign, whereas Augustine’s definition refers to sensible<br />

signs only: “For a sign is a thing which <strong>of</strong> itself makes something o<strong>the</strong>r come into<br />

thought beside <strong>the</strong> impression it makes upon <strong>the</strong> senses.” Bacon defends his choice<br />

for a broader notion by referring to Aristotle who says that passions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul<br />

(mental presentations) are signs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> things outside <strong>the</strong> mind. 62<br />

According to Bacon, a sign is ei<strong>the</strong>r (1) natural or (2) given by a living being<br />

(data ab anima). (1) Natural signs occur in various modes, depending on <strong>the</strong> kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> relationship between sign and significate. For example, in <strong>the</strong> (1.1) inference<br />

‘she has milk; <strong>the</strong>refore she has given birth’, <strong>the</strong>re is a (1.1.1) necessary relationship<br />

between sign (having milk) and significate (having given birth). Likewise, dawn is<br />

a natural sign <strong>of</strong> imminent sunrise through necessary inference. In o<strong>the</strong>r cases, for<br />

example in ‘<strong>the</strong> ground is wet; <strong>the</strong>refore it has rained’ <strong>the</strong>re is a (1.1.2) probable<br />

relationship between sign and significate. In yet ano<strong>the</strong>r sense, a footprint in <strong>the</strong><br />

snow is also a natural sign: it signifies <strong>the</strong> person whose it is. 63 This kind <strong>of</strong> sign<br />

is (1.2) an expression <strong>of</strong> likeness. In this mode all artefacts are signs <strong>of</strong> art in <strong>the</strong><br />

mind <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> artist.<br />

(2) Signs that are given by living creatures (data ab anima) are divided into<br />

two sub-modes: <strong>the</strong>y can signify (2.1) naturally, e.g. in <strong>the</strong> sense that crying is a<br />

sign <strong>of</strong> grief, but <strong>the</strong>y can also signify (2.2) conventionally (ad placitum, litt.: at<br />

pleasure), as is <strong>the</strong> case with spoken and written words, gestures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deaf and<br />

signs <strong>of</strong> monks. O<strong>the</strong>r examples we could think <strong>of</strong> are traffic signs and <strong>the</strong> signs<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conductor <strong>of</strong> an orchestra. This completes Bacon’s division <strong>of</strong> signs in <strong>the</strong><br />

first chapter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Compendium.<br />

Bacon is aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equivocity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term ‘natural’ in his classification. The<br />

first sense is related to ‘nature’ as opposed to ‘intellect’. Bacon refers to Aristotle’s<br />

Physics for this distinction. 64 In <strong>the</strong> second sense, ‘natural’ means ‘arising from <strong>the</strong><br />

58Edited and translated by Thomas Maloney [1988]. See for more information about Roger<br />

Bacon’s life and works Maloney’s introduction to this work.<br />

59Compendium [25].<br />

60Rosier [1997, p. 94] argues that this originality claim is improbable.<br />

61De signis (2), ed. Fredborg et al., p. 82<br />

62Peri hermeneias, 16a3-8.<br />

63See for <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se examples: Marmo [1997, p. 145 ff].<br />

64 De signis (12).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!