22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

574 Simo Knuuttila<br />

[Bobzien, 1993] S. Bobzien. Chrysippus’s Modal <strong>Logic</strong> and Its relation to Philo and Diodorus.<br />

In K. Döring and T. Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1993),<br />

63-84.<br />

[Bobzien, 1998] S. Bobzien. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon,<br />

1998).<br />

[Boh, 1993] I. Boh. Epistemic <strong>Logic</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Later Middle Ages (London and New York: Routledge,<br />

1993).<br />

[Boh, 2001] I. Boh. Consequence and Rules <strong>of</strong> Consequences in <strong>the</strong> Post-Ockham Period. In M.<br />

Yrjönsuuri (ed., 2001), 147-81.<br />

[Braakhuis, 1979] H. A. G. Braakhuis. De 13de eeuwse tractaten over syncategorematische termen.<br />

Inleidende studie en uitgave van Nicolaas van Parijs’ Sincategoremata, 2 vols (Meppel:<br />

Krips Repro, 1979).<br />

[Braakhuis and Kneepkens, 2003] H. A. G. Braakhuis and C. H. Kneepkens. Introduction. In<br />

Braakhuis and Knepkens (eds.), Aristotle’s Peri hermeneias in <strong>the</strong> Latin Middle Ages, Artistarium<br />

supplementa 10 (Groningen – Haren: Ingenium Publishers, 2003), ix-xli.<br />

[Broadie, 1989] A. Broadie. Notion and Object: Aspects <strong>of</strong> Late Medieval Epistemology (Oxford:<br />

Clarendon Press, 1989), 125-48.<br />

[Buchheim et al., 2001] T. Buchheim, C. H. Kneepkens and K. Lorenz, eds. Potentialität und<br />

Possibilität. Modalaussagen in der Geschichte der Metaphysik (Stuttgart and Bad Canstatt:<br />

Frommann-Holzbook, 2001).<br />

[Buchner, 1970] H. Buchner. Plotins Möglichkeitslehre, Epimeleia 16 (Munich abd Salzburg:<br />

Anton Pustet, 1970).<br />

[Courtnay, 1991] W. Courtenay. Nominales and Nominalism in <strong>the</strong> Twelfth Century. In J. Jolivet,<br />

Z. Kaluza, A. de Libera (eds.), Lectionum varietates. Hommage à Paul Vignaux (1904-<br />

1987) (Paris: Vrin 1991), 11-48.<br />

[Craig, 1988] W. L. Craig. The Problem <strong>of</strong> Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from<br />

Aristotle to Suarez (Leiden: Brill, 1988).<br />

[de Rijk, 1972] L. M. de Rijk. See above.<br />

[Dutilh Novaes, 2005] C. Dutilh Novaes. Buridan’s consequentia: Consequence and Inference<br />

within a Token-based Semantics. <strong>History</strong> and Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Logic</strong> 26 (2005), 277-97.<br />

[Ebbesen, 1981] S. Ebbesen. Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici<br />

Elenchi, Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum VII.1-3 (Leiden: Brill,<br />

1981).<br />

[Ebbesen, 1981] S. Ebbesen. Analyzing Syllogisms or Anonymus Aurelianensis III —The(Pesumably)<br />

Earliest Latin Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Prior Analytics, and Its Greek Model, Cahiers<br />

de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin, Université de Copenhague 37 (1981), 1-20.<br />

[Ebbesen, 1992] S. Ebbesen. What Must One Have an Opinion About, Vivarium (30), 1992,<br />

62-79.<br />

[Ebbesen, 1993] S. Ebbesen. Medieval Latin Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian <strong>Logic</strong>al<br />

texts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries. In Ch. Burnett (ed.), Glosses and Commentaries<br />

on Aristotelian <strong>Logic</strong>al Texts: The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions,<br />

Warburg Institute Surveys and Texts 23 (London: The Warburg Institute, 1993), 129-77.<br />

[Ebbesen, 2004] S. Ebbesen. Echoes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Posterior Analytics in <strong>the</strong> Twelfth Century. In M.<br />

Lutz-Bachmann, A. Fidora, P. Antolic (eds.), Erkenntnis und Wissenschaft. Probleme der<br />

Epistemologie in der Philosophie des Mittelalters (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004), 69-92.<br />

[Green-Pedersen, 1984] N. J. Green-Pedersen. The Tradition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Topics in <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages<br />

(Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1984).<br />

[Fine, 1984] G. Fine. Truth and Necessity in De interpretatione 9, <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Philosophy Quarterly<br />

1 (1984), 23-47.<br />

[Frede, 1985] D. Frede. The Sea-Battle Reconsidered : A Defense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Traditional Interpretation,<br />

Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. III (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), 31-87.<br />

[Gaskin, 1995] R. Gaskin. The Sea Battle and <strong>the</strong> Master Argument, Quellen und Studien zur<br />

Philosophie 40 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995).<br />

[Gelber, 2004] H. Gelber. It Could Have Been O<strong>the</strong>rwise. Contingency and Necessity in Dominican<br />

Theology at Oxford 1300-350, Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters<br />

81 (Leiden: Brill, 2004).<br />

[Goris, 1996] H. Goris. Free Creatures <strong>of</strong> an Eternal God. Thomas Aquinas on God’s Infallible<br />

Foreknowledge and Irresistible Will (Leuven: Peeters, 1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!