22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LOGIC AND THEORIES OF MEANING IN<br />

THE LATE 13 th AND EARLY 14 th CENTURY<br />

INCLUDING THE MODISTAE<br />

Ria van der Lecq<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The scope <strong>of</strong> this chapter is <strong>the</strong> period between 1270 and 1320, <strong>of</strong> which Gordon<br />

Leff made <strong>the</strong> following observation:<br />

“No phase <strong>of</strong> Scholasticism, certainly in terms <strong>of</strong> our present knowledge,<br />

remains more confused than <strong>the</strong> events in <strong>the</strong> decades immediately<br />

each side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 1300.” [Leff, 1976, p. 32]<br />

Obviously, a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> research has been done since Leff wrote <strong>the</strong>se<br />

lines, but it is still not so easy to draw a clear picture <strong>of</strong> this period. At first sight,<br />

<strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> what happened just before and after <strong>the</strong> year 1300 looks more like<br />

a battlefield <strong>of</strong> competing metaphysical <strong>the</strong>ories than like an orderly development<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> earlier logicians. The contextual approach <strong>of</strong> logic seems to be<br />

abandonned and <strong>the</strong> discussions are dominated by epistemological and ontological<br />

questions. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as I hope to make clear, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 14 th century innovations<br />

cannot be appreciated without <strong>the</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late 13 th<br />

and early 14 th century philosophers.<br />

Late 13th and early 14 th century logic may be characterized by its interest<br />

for grammatical and metalogical problems. Grammar and logic were two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

traditional seven liberal arts, but <strong>the</strong> works <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> logicians and grammarians in<br />

this period reflect an interest in grammar and logic as sciences, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as<br />

arts. There was a common opinion that every science has to have an immutable<br />

object, but <strong>the</strong> texts show a considerable disagreement about <strong>the</strong> origin, status<br />

and ontological foundation <strong>of</strong> this object in <strong>the</strong> science <strong>of</strong> logic.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> debates about <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> words we see that referential problems were<br />

solved in terms <strong>of</strong> signification ra<strong>the</strong>r than supposition. Beside ‘signification’ <strong>the</strong><br />

key notion was ‘imposition’. The basic function <strong>of</strong> language is to signify things,<br />

and imposition is <strong>the</strong> way words acquire <strong>the</strong>ir meanings. This is supposed to<br />

work as follows: a first impositor investigates things and <strong>the</strong>ir properties and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

decides which sound (vox) should be used to signify that object. When this sound<br />

has been imponed to signify some thing, it becomes a sign and it has acquired

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!