22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

438 Catarina Dutilh Novaes<br />

logic in <strong>the</strong> continent, especially in Italy. 7<br />

Burley’s work is also representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> topics that were to become <strong>the</strong> logical<br />

topics par excellence throughout <strong>the</strong> 14 th century: he wrote a treatise on consequences<br />

early in his career [Walter Burley, 1980] (Green-Pedersen argues that this<br />

treatise was certainly written before 1302 — cf. [Green-Pedersen, 1981], as well as<br />

a treatise on supposition, and an influential treatise on obligations [Green, 1963].<br />

But he is perhaps most famous for his On <strong>the</strong> Purity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Art <strong>of</strong> <strong>Logic</strong> [Walter<br />

Burley, 2000], <strong>of</strong> which he wrote a shorter and a longer version. 8 For <strong>the</strong> present<br />

purposes, Burley’s treatises on consequences and on obligations are particularly<br />

important, as well as <strong>the</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Purity concerning consequences; <strong>the</strong>y will<br />

be <strong>the</strong> starting point for <strong>the</strong> conceptual analyses <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se topics in this<br />

chapter.<br />

Ockham, perhaps <strong>the</strong> most famous 14 th century philosopher now as well as <strong>the</strong>n,<br />

was slightly younger than Burley. He led an agitated life, most notably marked<br />

by his quarrels with <strong>the</strong> Avignon popes. 9 He wrote on logic for only a very brief<br />

period <strong>of</strong> his life, before his departure to Avignon; but his work on logic, especially<br />

his Summa <strong>Logic</strong>ae [William <strong>of</strong> Ockham, 1974] was to have a significant impact<br />

in subsequent developments. However, Ockham’s writings will not be among <strong>the</strong><br />

main objects <strong>of</strong> analysis in this chapter: his semantics is already thoroughly examined<br />

elsewhere in this volume, and his <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> obligations (described in his<br />

Summa <strong>Logic</strong>ae III-3, chaps. 39-45) is not particularly important for <strong>the</strong> development<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories in <strong>the</strong> 14 th century. Only his writings on consequence<br />

(Summa <strong>Logic</strong>ae III-3) will be examined in <strong>the</strong> appropriate section below.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> same period, Adam Wodeham is now mostly known as <strong>the</strong> secretary<br />

and assistant <strong>of</strong> Ockham in <strong>the</strong> period in which <strong>the</strong> latter was writing <strong>the</strong> Summa<br />

<strong>Logic</strong>ae (in <strong>the</strong> 1320s); although Wodeham has made important contributions as<br />

diffusor and also critic <strong>of</strong> Ockham (especially with respect to his epistemology),<br />

his contribution to logic does not seem to have been significant. He is, though,<br />

currently thought to be <strong>the</strong> creator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctrine <strong>of</strong> complexe significabile, which<br />

was later to be defended by <strong>the</strong> Parisian <strong>the</strong>ologian Gregory <strong>of</strong> Rimini (see below in<br />

<strong>the</strong> next section), and was to become an influential <strong>the</strong>ory concerning <strong>the</strong> meaning<br />

and truthmakers <strong>of</strong> propositions, with applications to epistemology.<br />

Besides <strong>the</strong> very famous Ockham and Burley, several o<strong>the</strong>r extremely innovative<br />

and bright masters were active in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 14 th century in England<br />

(<strong>the</strong> Black Death in 1349 is usually considered as a convenient divisor between<br />

this period and <strong>the</strong> one to follow, each having quite distinct characteristics — cf.<br />

[Ashworth and Spade, 1992]). As already mentioned, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se masters were<br />

connected to Merton College in Oxford, and are thus <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as <strong>the</strong> ‘Mertonians’<br />

(<strong>of</strong>ten also as <strong>the</strong> ‘Oxford Calculators’ — see [Sylla, 1982]). The Merto-<br />

7For brief but informative overviews <strong>of</strong> Burley’s life and influence, see [Spade, 2000; Conti,<br />

2004].<br />

8On <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r awkward title <strong>of</strong> Burley’s masterpiece, which might be better translated as<br />

On <strong>the</strong> Essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Art <strong>of</strong> <strong>Logic</strong>, see [Spade and Menn, 2003].<br />

9For an account <strong>of</strong> Ockham’s life and influence, see [Courtenay, 1999].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!