22.06.2013 Views

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

Handbook of the History of Logic: - Fordham University Faculty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 Terence Parsons<br />

In both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se cases <strong>the</strong> modality is predicated <strong>of</strong> what Buridan and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

called a dictum — roughly, <strong>of</strong> “what is said”. In <strong>the</strong> last two propositions this<br />

is clear. These are <strong>the</strong> sorts <strong>of</strong> propositions in which a subject or a predicate<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> a sub-clause which apparently supposits for a proposition. These are<br />

really assertoric propositions; <strong>the</strong>y predicate a modal predicate <strong>of</strong> a proposition<br />

or propositions, but <strong>the</strong>ir own copula is unaffected and so <strong>the</strong>y are not genuinely<br />

modal. It is not clear exactly how to formulate a semantics for <strong>the</strong> first examples<br />

with modal adverbs, but <strong>the</strong>y seem to be exact parallels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second sort. If you<br />

change <strong>the</strong> adverb to <strong>the</strong> corresponding adjective plus copula, and make <strong>the</strong> rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence into a sub-clause, you get propositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second sort. The<br />

main clause <strong>the</strong>n contains a newly introduced copula which is itself unaffected by<br />

<strong>the</strong> modal words in <strong>the</strong> proposition.<br />

We already have a syntax and semantics for <strong>the</strong> next-to-last proposition. For<br />

example:<br />

That every donkey is an animal is necessary<br />

is true iff <strong>the</strong>re is a mental proposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<br />

every donkey is an animal<br />

which is necessary. (Whe<strong>the</strong>r such a proposition is necessary or not depends in<br />

part on one’s metaphysical views. Presumably <strong>the</strong> proposition just given is not<br />

necessary because it has existential import, and so it is false if no donkeys exist.)<br />

Kind 3: Modal Propositions<br />

A real modal proposition is one in which a modal word applies to <strong>the</strong> copula.<br />

These come in at least three varieties.<br />

1. Modal adverbs modifying <strong>the</strong> copula alone<br />

The least-discussed cases are ones in which a modal adverb or prepositional<br />

phrase directly modifies <strong>the</strong> copula with no o<strong>the</strong>r effect on <strong>the</strong> sentence.<br />

Such cases look just like <strong>the</strong> first class under (2) except <strong>the</strong>y are to be read<br />

with <strong>the</strong> modal expression applying to <strong>the</strong> copula instead <strong>of</strong> applying to <strong>the</strong><br />

whole proposition. Examples are:<br />

Some animal possibly-is grey<br />

Every donkey necessarily-is an animal<br />

Every donkey <strong>of</strong>-necessity-is an animal<br />

He possibly-is grey<br />

2. Combinations with <strong>the</strong> helping verb ‘can’<br />

The second class uses <strong>the</strong> verb ‘can’(’potest’) as a helping verb with <strong>the</strong><br />

copula. The copula takes its infinitive form; o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong>re is no effect on<br />

<strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expression. Cases <strong>of</strong> this sort are:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!