05.11.2013 Views

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

360<br />

Keimpe Algra<br />

curs, as the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus puts it, ex fixo et immutabili naturae<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>e. 2<br />

However, the analogy with Sp<strong>in</strong>oza may mislead, s<strong>in</strong>ce it overlooks<br />

some crucial differences. Sp<strong>in</strong>oza conceived of his philosophy as a radically<br />

new <strong>and</strong> methodologically <strong>in</strong>novative way of deal<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

world. The Stoics – however radical their philosophy, particularly<br />

their ethics, may have been <strong>in</strong> some respects – were at the same time<br />

eager to establish some sort of connection with the preced<strong>in</strong>g religious<br />

<strong>and</strong> mythical traditions of the Greeks. The edifice of Greek religion <strong>and</strong><br />

myth, or so they appear to have believed, was <strong>in</strong> the end <strong>in</strong>ferior <strong>in</strong><br />

clarity <strong>and</strong> soundness to (Stoic) philosophy. Yet it conta<strong>in</strong>ed kernels<br />

of truth which owed their existence to the fact that the people of<br />

old, even if they had had to do without a fully-fledged philosophy,<br />

had possessed ‘natural concepts’ or ‘preconceptions’ of isolated notions<br />

such as ‘god’. 3 This is not to say that the Stoics were the straightforward<br />

religious conservatives they have sometimes been taken to have been.<br />

They were <strong>in</strong> general rather selective <strong>in</strong> what they took over from<br />

the tradition, accept<strong>in</strong>g only those elements – concepts, myths, aspects<br />

of cult – which they could somehow ‘appropriate’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>in</strong>to<br />

their physical <strong>and</strong> theological world view. 4 To a certa<strong>in</strong> extent, <strong>in</strong><br />

other words, they tried to rationalize the irrational, or as they would<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k of it themselves: to further rationalize <strong>and</strong> systematize the partially<br />

rational aspects of the tradition. This general attitude was most famously<br />

exemplified by their will<strong>in</strong>gness to describe, or rather re-describe, part<br />

of the traditional Greek pantheon as parts or aspects of the s<strong>in</strong>gle cosmic<br />

deity whose existence was taken to be proved by their philosophy. 5<br />

In the present paper I propose to <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether <strong>and</strong> to what<br />

extent anyth<strong>in</strong>g like an appropriation of parts or aspects of traditional<br />

demonology was effected <strong>in</strong> Stoicism. I shall chart the (relatively<br />

under-researched) evidence, reconstruct the outl<strong>in</strong>es of the underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

theory, <strong>and</strong> signal some problems <strong>and</strong> developments. I shall beg<strong>in</strong> (section<br />

2) by offer<strong>in</strong>g a brief survey of the various conceptions of demons<br />

2 See Israel 2001, esp. 375–405.<br />

3 See Algra 2007a, 12 –17.<br />

4 For the Greek <strong>and</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> equivalents of the verb ‘to appropriate’, see Philodemus,<br />

Piet. PHerc. 1428, col. vi, 16 – 26 (sumoijeioOm) <strong>and</strong> Cicero, N.D. I, 41 (accomodare).<br />

5 For Stoic philosophical <strong>in</strong>terpretations of the early poets see Long 1992a <strong>and</strong><br />

Algra 2001. For Stoic attitudes vis-à-vis the religious tradition <strong>in</strong> general, see<br />

Algra 2007a.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!