05.11.2013 Views

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

454<br />

Jonathan Barnes<br />

He was neither the first nor the last philosopher so to proceed; nor is<br />

the double appeal peculiarly Christian. Still, you might wonder why<br />

Tertullian adopted it; <strong>and</strong> one passage <strong>in</strong> On the <strong>Soul</strong> has been thought<br />

to h<strong>in</strong>t at an explanation. After Chapter 25 has recorded various – conflict<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– pagan views on the first association between soul <strong>and</strong> body,<br />

Chapter 26 beg<strong>in</strong>s like this:<br />

All this <strong>in</strong>congruity of human op<strong>in</strong>ion extends as far as the boundaries of<br />

God: I shall now take up position <strong>in</strong> our own l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> prove to Christians<br />

the answer which I have given to the philosophers <strong>and</strong> doctors. (26.1)<br />

The argument which follows appeals to various Biblical texts: Tertullian<br />

appears to mean that he offers the Scriptures to Christian readers <strong>and</strong><br />

reason<strong>in</strong>gs to the pagans. So, quite generally, the double appeal to argument<br />

<strong>and</strong> authority answers to the needs of a double readership: argument<br />

for the pagans, authority for the Christians. 13<br />

That is a pretty idea; but it can hardly be right – for whatever may<br />

have been <strong>in</strong> his m<strong>in</strong>d at 26.1, Tertullian can scarcely have expected or<br />

hoped that his essay would circulate among the pagans. It is, of course,<br />

easy to <strong>in</strong>vent explanations, some bad <strong>and</strong> some good, for the double<br />

appeal; <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> any event, one th<strong>in</strong>g is pla<strong>in</strong>: although the Scriptures<br />

may be sufficient proof both of the errors of pagans <strong>and</strong> heretics <strong>and</strong><br />

of the truths of the Christian faith, Scriptural citation is not the only<br />

weapon which Tertullian uses <strong>in</strong> his skirmish<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

To be sure, the fact that Tertullian deploys abstract reason<strong>in</strong>g as well<br />

as biblical quotation does not, <strong>in</strong> itself, imply that he will sometimes<br />

adopt the ideas <strong>and</strong> the arguments of the pagan philosophers – after<br />

all, the reason<strong>in</strong>g with which Scriptural authority is conjo<strong>in</strong>ed might,<br />

<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, be reason<strong>in</strong>g of a specially Christian stamp. Nonetheless,<br />

as a matter of fact Tertullian did summon the pagans to his aid, <strong>and</strong><br />

some of his reason<strong>in</strong>gs are taken – directly <strong>and</strong> openly – from pagan<br />

sources: pagan th<strong>in</strong>kers make a positive contribution to Christian psychology.<br />

Tertullian’s first task <strong>in</strong> On the <strong>Soul</strong> is to determ<strong>in</strong>e what souls are made<br />

of, to fix their stuff. The Scriptures will, of course, provide the right answers<br />

to his questions; but Tertullian does not <strong>in</strong>voke the authority of<br />

13 Wasz<strong>in</strong>k paraphrases thus: “After giv<strong>in</strong>g an advice to philosophers <strong>and</strong> physicians,<br />

I now proceed to the furnish<strong>in</strong>g of conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g proofs from the Scriptures<br />

to my Christian readers” (1947, 335).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!