05.11.2013 Views

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

450<br />

Jonathan Barnes<br />

ity of choice <strong>and</strong> not by necessity from the authority of creation – that does<br />

not come about by nature. (52.2)<br />

Tertullian contrasts this true view with the widespread notion accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to which some deaths are ord<strong>in</strong>ary, tranquil, <strong>and</strong> natural whereas others<br />

are extraord<strong>in</strong>ary, violent, <strong>and</strong> unnatural. He might have contrasted the<br />

true view with the view of the pagan philosophers, who, whether or<br />

not they dist<strong>in</strong>guished between (as we should put it) death by natural<br />

causes <strong>and</strong> death by misadventure, supposed that death is as natural<br />

for men as it is for the other animals <strong>and</strong> for plants.<br />

Tertullian accepts a pagan commonplace 8 which def<strong>in</strong>es the nature<br />

of death: “The function of death is evident: it is a dissolution of body<br />

<strong>and</strong> soul.” (51.1) “This is the function of death: a separation of flesh<br />

<strong>and</strong> soul.” (52.1) That be<strong>in</strong>g so, then s<strong>in</strong>ce death is unnatural, a body<br />

without a soul is <strong>in</strong> an unnatural state <strong>and</strong> a soul without a body is <strong>in</strong><br />

an unnatural state.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the doctr<strong>in</strong>e of the General Resurrection, at some future<br />

time – the date was sometimes, <strong>and</strong> unwisely, specified – the world<br />

will end, the graves will open, the putrescent cadavers will be swabbed<br />

down <strong>and</strong> reunited with their lost souls, <strong>and</strong> we shall then all go before<br />

the mighty throne of judgement. At the end of his discussion of the false<br />

eschatology of the metempsychotic philosophers, Tertullian outl<strong>in</strong>es the<br />

true account:<br />

God will judge more fully, s<strong>in</strong>ce he will judge more f<strong>in</strong>ally. His sentence,<br />

for torment or for delight, is eternal. It is pronounced on souls which are<br />

rejo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g not beasts but their own bodies. It is pronounced one s<strong>in</strong>gle time,<br />

<strong>and</strong> on a day which the Father alone knows, so that, <strong>in</strong> a suspense of expectation,<br />

the power of our faith may be proved, ever on the watch as it<br />

is ever <strong>in</strong> ignorance <strong>and</strong> everyday fear<strong>in</strong>g what everyday it hopes. (33.11)<br />

For this Last Judgement bodies <strong>and</strong> souls, unnaturally separated by<br />

death, come together aga<strong>in</strong>: not any soul <strong>and</strong> any body, not even any<br />

soul <strong>and</strong> any human body – rather, “let Christians remember that at<br />

the resurrection their souls will receive the same bodies <strong>in</strong> which they<br />

died” (56.5). And so the soul of a dead <strong>in</strong>fant will f<strong>in</strong>d itself back <strong>in</strong><br />

its <strong>in</strong>fantile body, while the soul of a decrepit old man will recover its<br />

decrepit old body. (Tertullian does not appear to notice that this<br />

might be a depress<strong>in</strong>g prospect for some of us; <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> fact most of his<br />

8 E.g. Plato: “Death is the departure of the soul from the body” (Phd. 64c);<br />

Chrysippus: “Death is a separation of the soul from the body” (Plutarch,<br />

St. rep. 1052c).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!