05.11.2013 Views

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stoics on souls <strong>and</strong> demons: Reconstruct<strong>in</strong>g Stoic demonology 377<br />

surviv<strong>in</strong>g human souls, <strong>and</strong> Posidonius to demons <strong>in</strong> general, concerned<br />

div<strong>in</strong>ation. A passage <strong>in</strong> Cicero’s De div<strong>in</strong>atione most probably derives<br />

from Chrysippus’ On Visions <strong>in</strong> Sleep (Peq· 1mupm_ym). 53 The story offered<br />

by Cicero goes as follows. Two friends went to Megara; the<br />

one put up at an <strong>in</strong>n, the other went to a local friend’s house. In the<br />

middle of the night the latter got a dream <strong>in</strong> which his companion<br />

told him that he was about to be killed by the <strong>in</strong>nkeeper. On closer consideration<br />

he thought noth<strong>in</strong>g of the dream <strong>and</strong> went to bed. But then<br />

his friend appeared aga<strong>in</strong>, begg<strong>in</strong>g him that, although he had ignored his<br />

cry for help while he was still alive, he should at least not allow his dead<br />

body to go unburied. He gave directions as to where it was hidden. In<br />

the morn<strong>in</strong>g the friend discovered the body <strong>and</strong> the perpetrator was<br />

punished. Like Chrysippus’ On Visions <strong>in</strong> Sleep, also Posidonius appears<br />

to have connected demons with div<strong>in</strong>ation. We have Cicero’s paraphrase<br />

of his account of three forms of div<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> sleep (Div. I, 64<br />

= fr. 108 EK), which may well come from the book On Heroes <strong>and</strong> Demons.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Cicero’s Posidonius this k<strong>in</strong>d of div<strong>in</strong>ation may take<br />

place:<br />

(1) through what the soul itself foresees, <strong>in</strong>asmuch as it is imbued with<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ship with the gods; or<br />

(2) through what is provided by spirits of which the air is replete (plenus<br />

immortalium animorum); or<br />

(3) through what is conferred directly by god or gods themselves.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Cicero these three categories represent three ways <strong>in</strong><br />

which our self can be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the div<strong>in</strong>e (deorum adpulso): through<br />

our <strong>in</strong>ternal demon <strong>and</strong> its k<strong>in</strong>ship with the cosmic god; through external<br />

demons; <strong>and</strong> directly by god himself. Various elements <strong>in</strong> this testimony<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> problematic – thus one wonders whether the reference to<br />

immortal spirits can be correct (it may be due to Cicero rather than to<br />

Posidonius’ orig<strong>in</strong>al text), <strong>and</strong> the relation between (1) <strong>and</strong> (3) rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

rather unclear 54 – but the description of the second type of div<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

must be referr<strong>in</strong>g to the role of external demons.<br />

53 See the parallel version <strong>in</strong> the Suidas (SVF II, 1205) which is explicitly ascribed<br />

to Chrysippus; <strong>and</strong> the remark <strong>in</strong> Cicero, Div. II, 144 (SVF II, 1206) that<br />

Chrysippus’ book was full of such stories.<br />

54 For some details see the commentary <strong>in</strong> Kidd 1988, 428–432.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!