05.11.2013 Views

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stoics on souls <strong>and</strong> demons: Reconstruct<strong>in</strong>g Stoic demonology 371<br />

for lack of anyth<strong>in</strong>g else to keep it together. 36 Sextus’ Stoics now reply<br />

by claim<strong>in</strong>g that it is the other way round: the soul gives coherence to<br />

the body, as well as to itself. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, although the dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />

the body suggests that the soul is no longer <strong>in</strong> the body, it does not preclude<br />

the possibility that the soul keeps its own coherence <strong>and</strong> survives<br />

elsewhere.<br />

Further evidence shows, however, that the early Stoics were divided<br />

when it came to the details of the theory, which may have contributed<br />

to the apparent scepticism of later Stoics, to which I will turn <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

section of this paper. There was general agreement that survival did not<br />

imply eternity <strong>and</strong> that surviv<strong>in</strong>g human souls could last at most until<br />

the next conflagration. But as to who exactly would survive <strong>and</strong> for<br />

how long, there was disagreement. Diogenes Laertius tells us that<br />

Chrysippus believed only the souls of the virtuous would live on<br />

until the next conflagration, whereas Cleanthes accorded this prospect<br />

to all souls. 37 The common Stoic account provided by Arius Didymus<br />

shows that, as was often the case, it was Chrysippus’ view that carried<br />

the day: “The soul, they say, comes to be <strong>and</strong> is perishable. Yet it<br />

does not perish immediately on leav<strong>in</strong>g the body, but rema<strong>in</strong>s for<br />

some time on its own: the soul of the sages until the dissolution of everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>to fire, the soul of the fools for some time.” 38 Why this difference<br />

between the fate of the good <strong>and</strong> that of the rest? As we just<br />

saw, Sextus’ account connects the question of survival with the cohesive<br />

force of the soul. And as we noted <strong>in</strong> the previous section, the Stoics<br />

associated virtue <strong>and</strong> vice at a physical level with different degrees of<br />

pneumatic tension (tonos) of the soul. 39 Together these considerations<br />

suggest that the different fates of virtuous <strong>and</strong> non-virtuous souls after<br />

death were somehow thought to be connected with their different<br />

tonos-structure. This seems to be confirmed by a second doxographical<br />

report <strong>in</strong> Aëtius: “The Stoics claim that the soul, on leav<strong>in</strong>g the body,<br />

does not perish at once. The weaker soul becomes a weak structure (that<br />

36 On the relation of soul <strong>and</strong> body <strong>in</strong> general, see Lucretius III, 323–416. On the<br />

body as conta<strong>in</strong>er (vas), see III, 440 <strong>and</strong> 455.<br />

37 D.L. VII, 157 (SVF I, 528; II, 811): Jke\mhgr l³m owmp\sar 1pidial]meim l]wqi<br />

t/r 1jpuq~seyr, Wqus_ppor d³ t±r t_msov_m l|mom.<br />

38 Arius Didymus fr. 39 Diels (SVF II, 809): tµm d³xuwµm cemet^m te ja· vhaqtµm<br />

k]cousim. oqj eqh»rd³toO s~lator !pakkace?sam vhe_qeshai, !kk’ 1pil]meim<br />

tim±r wq|mour jah’ 2aut^m tµm l³mt_mspouda_ym l]wqi t/r eQrpOq!mak}seyr<br />

t_m p\mtym, tµm d³t_m!vq|moym pq¹r timar wq|mour.<br />

39 See above, 369.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!