25.06.2013 Views

Bananas and Food Security - Bioversity International

Bananas and Food Security - Bioversity International

Bananas and Food Security - Bioversity International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

710 Les productions bananières / <strong>Bananas</strong> <strong>and</strong> food security – Session 4<br />

second plantain crops) <strong>and</strong> compounded to the present values using the appropriate<br />

interest rates. The economic viability of each production strategy was then determined.<br />

Measures of returns<br />

Two measures of returns were calculated for the ex-post evaluation of the production<br />

strategies (Gittinger 1982):<br />

1. The Benefit-Cost ratio (B/C) which is defined as the ratio of the present value of benefits<br />

from a management strategy to the present value of the flow of expenditures. The<br />

Benefit-Cost ratio was expressed as:<br />

t=n t=n<br />

B/C =∑ (1+r) t Bjt /∑ (1+r) t Cjt t=1 t=1<br />

2. The Net Present Value (NPV) which is defined as the present value of the net cash flow<br />

from a management strategy. The NPV was expressed as:<br />

t=n<br />

NPV =∑ (1+r) t (Bjt - Cjt )<br />

t=1<br />

where:<br />

Bjt = benefit from a strategy ‘j’ in year ‘t’<br />

Cjt = cost of a strategy ‘j’ in year ‘t’<br />

t = 1, 2 – – – n<br />

n = number of years from the present study year<br />

r = interest (compound) rate.<br />

The extra returns received from changing from the traditional method of plantain<br />

production to a new improved method was estimated as the compensation to the farmer.<br />

This was calculated for treatments 2 (treated material, farmer’s management with<br />

intercropping) <strong>and</strong> 4 (treated material, researcher’s management with intercropping)<br />

compared with treatment 1 (untreated material, farmer’s management with<br />

intercropping).<br />

A plantain production strategy was considered to be economically viable if it had a<br />

B/C of greater than one <strong>and</strong> a positive NPV, at appropriate rates of capital. Greater<br />

consideration was, however, given to the NPV, since it is the preferred measure of project<br />

worth choosing among mutually exclusive projects or project options (Gittinger, 1982).<br />

Data collection<br />

Data were obtained from the researchers, extension staff (Ministry of <strong>Food</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Agriculture, Ghana) <strong>and</strong> farmers involved with the trial <strong>and</strong> from a farm market survey.<br />

Farm level expenditures for each treatment were structured to include:<br />

• Quantity of suckers required (treated or untreated) <strong>and</strong> their cost,<br />

• Labour used (family labour, hired labour) <strong>and</strong> wage rates,<br />

• Number of weedings per year <strong>and</strong> time taken to weed,<br />

• L<strong>and</strong>/plot size <strong>and</strong> rent,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!