23.11.2013 Aufrufe

tekom-Jahrestagung 2012 - ActiveDoc

tekom-Jahrestagung 2012 - ActiveDoc

tekom-Jahrestagung 2012 - ActiveDoc

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

International Management<br />

Risks and threats<br />

Levers to choose the right systems and services<br />

Tenders, biddings or requests for quotation, proposal or information etc.<br />

which currently mostly focus on transparency and cost, regularly lead to<br />

wrong decisions when it comes to systems and services.<br />

What is said here mainly fits to systems but most of it is also true for<br />

services.<br />

Good systems and their successful integration into existing environments<br />

require mainly skills on the supplier side that cannot be measured:<br />

Ability to work in cross-functional and cross-company teams or<br />

knowledge sharing to enable common developments. Furthermore, deep<br />

knowledge of special technologies is mostly needed. Not to forget the<br />

engagement of every involved employee.<br />

Instead of a focus on cost, supplier and customer should focus on an<br />

alignment of interests. In addition to that they also must trust each<br />

other to ensure that both parties “run into the right direction”.<br />

The question to be answered during the bidding phase for systems and<br />

services is not: “What is the cheapest solution to my problem?” but “Who<br />

helps me to be competitive and innovative in the future?”<br />

Innovation is missed<br />

If customers don’t manage to choose the right suppliers or partners for<br />

systems and services, they are not prepared for future challenges on<br />

global markets where factor cost always can be underbid. Future competitiveness<br />

needs innovation throughout all product life cycle steps<br />

and via the whole supply chain.<br />

High non conformity cost (NCC)<br />

Empirical experience shows that 60–70% of follow-up cost appear during<br />

or after project execution but their cause is to be found during the<br />

decision phase. NCC examples are:<br />

−−<br />

Project target missed (time and/or budget)<br />

−−<br />

Rework before going life<br />

−−<br />

Rework after going life<br />

What goes wrong during the decision phase?<br />

The wrong questions are asked, misleading incentives such as “savings”<br />

are set and the courage for a big innovation and change is missing. If<br />

expectations are high, small innovations or adjustments to existing systems<br />

won’t deliver sufficient results.<br />

How to do it right?<br />

Cost-focused tenders or biddings are not suitable for systems and services.<br />

Below list of suggestions shall trigger discussions and change<br />

current techniques.<br />

−−<br />

Don’t incentivise cost savings.<br />

Sustainable long term success should be honored instead.<br />

−−<br />

Avoid concurrent targets among team members.<br />

For example don’t define for IT stuff that new systems must be avoided<br />

while other team members should spot new innovative software.<br />

<strong>tekom</strong>-<strong>Jahrestagung</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

87

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!