MANUAL DE PRUEBA PERICIAL_Suprema Corte

Las ciencias forenses a la luz del ADN 291
González-Rodríguez, J., “Evaluating automatic speaker recognition systems: An
overview of the NIST speaker recognition evaluations (1996-2014)”,
Loquens, vol. 1, núm. 1, e007-e007, 2014.
Hannig, J., Riman, S., Iyer, H. y Vallone, P. M., “Are reported likelihood ratios
well calibrated?”, Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series,
vol. 7, núm. 1, 2019.
International Organization for Standardization, 2002. Disponible en <https://
www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/wsd_message_2002.pdf>.
Kennedy, D., “Forensic science: oxymoron?”, Science, vol. 302, núm. 5651, 2003.
Lindley, D. V., “A problem in forensic science”, Biometrika, vol. 64, núm. 2, 1977.
Lucy, D., Introduction to statistics for forensic scientists, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Meterko, V., “Strengths and Limitations of Forensic Science: What ADN Exonerations
Have Taught Us and Where to Go from Here”, West Virginia Law
Review, vol. 119, núm. 2, 2016.
Meuwly, D., Ramos, D. y Haraksim, R., “A guideline for the validation of likelihood
ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation”, Forensic Science international,
vol. 276, 2017.
Morrison, G. S. y Thompson, W. C., “Assessing the admissibility of a new generation
of forensic voice comparison testimony”, Science and Technology Law
Review, vol. 18, núm. 2, 2016.
Morrison, G. S., Neumann, C. y Geoghegan, P. H., “Vacuous standards-subversion
of the OSAC standards-development process”, Forensic Science International:
Synergy, vol. 2, 2020.