05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scenario Driving Forces J 09<br />

UN 1998 Low Range<br />

Medium<br />

IIASA 1996<br />

2000 2050 2100 2150<br />

Figure 3-3: Central projections extracted from Figure 3-2 show excellent agreement among the central projections over the<br />

next 100 years (with the possible exception of the IIASA projection).<br />

databases, the dominance of population momentum associated<br />

with a young population age structure, and the assumption of<br />

replacement-level fertility in the long term.<br />

Figure 3-4 shows the breakdown of population growth<br />

projections in industrial countries (IND) and developing<br />

countries (DEV) as defined by the UN. The key conclusion to<br />

draw from Figure 3-4 is the dominance of the DEV population<br />

on future world population growth.<br />

The most important variable to detennine future population<br />

levels is fertility. To a lesser extent, future population also<br />

depends on mortality and migration rates. Figure 3-5 shows the<br />

world-average total fertility rate (TFR), the average number of<br />

births per woman, assumed for the various projections.<br />

Overall, a fairly broad range of assumptions about future world<br />

average fertility is encompassed by the projections. Future<br />

population size is very sensitive (see Figure 3-2) to<br />

comparatively small changes in the long-range fertility rate.<br />

For example, within the UN projections, a decrease of the<br />

asymptotic fertility rate of less than half-a-birth per woman<br />

(from 2.1 to 1.7) decreases population in 2100 by 46% (UN,<br />

1998). Only the replacement-level fertility of about 2.1 results<br />

in a stable population in the long run.<br />

Such sensitivity to small asymptotic fertility-rate changes<br />

indicates the high and low projections from UN and IIASA are<br />

all feasible scenarios of the future population (Gaffin and<br />

O'Neill, 1998).<br />

Up to 2050, the IIASA central TFR is high compared with the<br />

UN and World Bank central projection. Later the IIASA central<br />

TFR dechnes to below replacement-level feitility rate, as<br />

depicted in Figure 3-5. As a result, the IIASA central forecast<br />

lies considerably above ail the others throughout the 21'*'<br />

century. After that, IIASA's below-replacement, long-term<br />

-b- UN 96 DEV<br />

IIASADEV<br />

a<br />

> ^<br />

О .2<br />

s s<br />

— £¡<br />

a ^<br />

о<br />

s a,<br />

о<br />

-o- USCBDEV<br />

-0- WB DEV<br />

_u_ UN 96 IND<br />

— IIASAIND<br />

-o- USCBIND<br />

- - 0 - WBIND<br />

2000 2050 2100 2150<br />

Figure 3-4: Industrial (IND) and developing (DEV) countries' population projections from the medium (central) variants. Note<br />

that regional definitions differ in IIASA compared to UN projections.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!