05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

150 Scenario Driving Forces<br />

fuel mix and also control measures for large point sources. This<br />

pattern emerges also from the literature on environmental<br />

Kuznets curves (e.g., World Bank, 1992; IIASA-WEC, 1995)<br />

and is corroborated by both longitudinal and cross-sectional<br />

empirical data reviewed in detail in Grübler (1998c).<br />

Historically, the decline in sulfur pollution levels was achieved<br />

simply by dispersion of pollutants (tall stacks policy).<br />

Subsequently, the actual emissions also started to decline, as a<br />

result of both structural change (substitution of solids by gas<br />

and electricity as end-use fuels) and sulfur reduction measures<br />

(oil product desulfurization and scrubbing of large point<br />

sources).<br />

<strong>Emissions</strong> for 1990 reported in the scenarios reviewed in<br />

Chapter 2 and in Grübler (1998c) indicate a range from 55 to<br />

91 MtS. The upper range is explained largely by a lack of<br />

complete coverage of SO2 emission sources in long-term<br />

scenario studies and models. Lower values coirespond to<br />

studies drat include only the dominant energy sector emissions<br />

(range of 59.7 to 65.4 MtS), and higher estimates also include<br />

other sources, most notably metallurgical and from biomass<br />

burning. None of the long-term scenario studies appears to<br />

include SO2 emissions from intemational bunker (shipping)<br />

fuels, estimated at 3 + 1 MtS in 1990 (Olivier et al., 1996;<br />

Corbett et al, 1999; Smith et ai, 2000). Historical global<br />

sulfur emissions estimates are given in Dignon and Hameed<br />

(1989).<br />

Grübler (1998c) also argues that SO2 control and intervention<br />

policies in many rapidly industrializing countries (particularly<br />

those with high population densities) are highly likely to be<br />

phased in more quickly than the historical experience of<br />

Europe, North America, Japan, or Korea. This analysis is<br />

supported by existing policies and trends in Brazil, China, and<br />

India (Shukla et al., 1999; Rosa and Schechtman, 1996; Qian<br />

and Zhang, 1998). Most recent SO2 emission inventory data<br />

suggest that since 1990 SO2 emission growth has significantly<br />

slowed in East Asia compared to earlier forecasts, in response<br />

to the first SOj control measures implemented in China, South<br />

Korea and Thailand (Streets and Waldhoff 2000). Dadi et al.<br />

(1998) estimate that in 1995 about 11% (1.5 MtS of a total of<br />

13.5 MtS gross emissions) of China's SO2 emissions were<br />

removed through various control measures.<br />

The evaluation of the IS92 scenarios (Alcamo et al, 1995)<br />

concluded that the projected SOj emissions in the IS92<br />

scenarios do not reflect recent changes in sulfur-related<br />

environmental legislation, in particular the amendments to the<br />

Clean Air Act in the USA, and the Second European Sulfur<br />

Protocol. Increasingly, many developing countries are adopting<br />

sulfur control legislation that ranges from reduction of sulfur<br />

contents in oil products (e.g. China, Thailand, and India; see<br />

Streets et al., 2000), through a maximum sulfur content in coal<br />

(e.g. in China; see Streets and Waldhoff, 2000), to SO2 controls<br />

at coal-fired power plants (e.g. China, South Korea, Thailand;<br />

for a review see lEA, 1999). For instance, an estimated 3575<br />

MW of coal-fired electricity China is generated by plants<br />

already equipped with sulfur control devices (lEA, 1999).<br />

Since publication of the IS92 scenarios a number of important<br />

new sulfur impact studies have become available, and analyzed<br />

in particular:<br />

• Implications of acidic deposition levels of high SOj<br />

emissions scenarios such as IS92a (Amann et al., 1995;<br />

Posch etal, 1996).<br />

• Aggregate ecosystems impacts, especially whether<br />

critical loads for acidification are exceeded given<br />

deposition levels and different buffering capacities of<br />

soils (Amann et al., 1995; Posch et al, 1996).<br />

• Direct vegetation damage, particularly on food crops<br />

(Fischer and Rosenzweig, 1996).<br />

These studies provide further infomation on the impacts of<br />

high concentrations and deposition of SO2 emissions, beyond<br />

the well-documented impacts on human health, ecosystems<br />

productivity, and material damages (for reviews see Cratzen<br />

and Graedel, 1986; WHO and UNEP, 1993; WMO, 1997).<br />

These studies are particularly important because they<br />

document environmental changes of high-emission scenarios<br />

by using detailed representations of the numerous non-linear<br />

dose-response relationships between emissions, atmospheric<br />

concentrations, deposition, ecosystems sensitivity thresholds,<br />

and impacts. All recent studies agree that unabated high SOj<br />

emissions along the Hues of IS92a or even above would yield<br />

high impacts not only for natural ecosystems and forests, but<br />

also for economically important food crops and human health,<br />

especially in Asia where emissions growth is projected to be<br />

particularly high.<br />

A representative result (based on Amann et al, 1995) is shown<br />

in Figure 3-17, which contrasts 1990 European sulfur<br />

deposition levels with those of Asia by 2050 in a high SO2<br />

emission scenario (very close to IS 92a). Typically, in such<br />

scenarios, SO, emissions in Asia alone could surpass current<br />

global levels as early as 2020 (Amann et al, 1995; Posch et al,<br />

1996). Sulfur deposition above 5 g/m^ per year occurred in<br />

Europe in 1990 in the area of the borders of the Czech<br />

Republic, Poland, and Germany (the former GDR), often<br />

referred to as the "black triangle." In view of its ecological<br />

impacts it was officially designated by UNEP as an "ecological<br />

disaster zone." In a scenario such as IS92a (or even higher<br />

emissions), similar high sulfur deposition would occur by<br />

around 2020 over more than half of Eastern China, large parts<br />

of southern Korea, and some smaller parts of Thailand and<br />

southern Japan.<br />

Fischer and Rosenzweig (1996) assessed the combined impacts<br />

of climate change and acidification of agricultural crops in<br />

Asia for such a scenario. Their overall conclusion was that the<br />

projected likely regional climate change would largely benefit<br />

agricultural output in China, whereas it would lower<br />

agricultural productivity on the Indian subcontinent (the<br />

combined effect of projected temperature and precipitation<br />

changes would have differential impacts across various crops<br />

and subrogions). However, projected high levels of acidic<br />

deposition in China would reduce agricultural output to an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!