Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
150 Scenario Driving Forces<br />
fuel mix and also control measures for large point sources. This<br />
pattern emerges also from the literature on environmental<br />
Kuznets curves (e.g., World Bank, 1992; IIASA-WEC, 1995)<br />
and is corroborated by both longitudinal and cross-sectional<br />
empirical data reviewed in detail in Grübler (1998c).<br />
Historically, the decline in sulfur pollution levels was achieved<br />
simply by dispersion of pollutants (tall stacks policy).<br />
Subsequently, the actual emissions also started to decline, as a<br />
result of both structural change (substitution of solids by gas<br />
and electricity as end-use fuels) and sulfur reduction measures<br />
(oil product desulfurization and scrubbing of large point<br />
sources).<br />
<strong>Emissions</strong> for 1990 reported in the scenarios reviewed in<br />
Chapter 2 and in Grübler (1998c) indicate a range from 55 to<br />
91 MtS. The upper range is explained largely by a lack of<br />
complete coverage of SO2 emission sources in long-term<br />
scenario studies and models. Lower values coirespond to<br />
studies drat include only the dominant energy sector emissions<br />
(range of 59.7 to 65.4 MtS), and higher estimates also include<br />
other sources, most notably metallurgical and from biomass<br />
burning. None of the long-term scenario studies appears to<br />
include SO2 emissions from intemational bunker (shipping)<br />
fuels, estimated at 3 + 1 MtS in 1990 (Olivier et al., 1996;<br />
Corbett et al, 1999; Smith et ai, 2000). Historical global<br />
sulfur emissions estimates are given in Dignon and Hameed<br />
(1989).<br />
Grübler (1998c) also argues that SO2 control and intervention<br />
policies in many rapidly industrializing countries (particularly<br />
those with high population densities) are highly likely to be<br />
phased in more quickly than the historical experience of<br />
Europe, North America, Japan, or Korea. This analysis is<br />
supported by existing policies and trends in Brazil, China, and<br />
India (Shukla et al., 1999; Rosa and Schechtman, 1996; Qian<br />
and Zhang, 1998). Most recent SO2 emission inventory data<br />
suggest that since 1990 SO2 emission growth has significantly<br />
slowed in East Asia compared to earlier forecasts, in response<br />
to the first SOj control measures implemented in China, South<br />
Korea and Thailand (Streets and Waldhoff 2000). Dadi et al.<br />
(1998) estimate that in 1995 about 11% (1.5 MtS of a total of<br />
13.5 MtS gross emissions) of China's SO2 emissions were<br />
removed through various control measures.<br />
The evaluation of the IS92 scenarios (Alcamo et al, 1995)<br />
concluded that the projected SOj emissions in the IS92<br />
scenarios do not reflect recent changes in sulfur-related<br />
environmental legislation, in particular the amendments to the<br />
Clean Air Act in the USA, and the Second European Sulfur<br />
Protocol. Increasingly, many developing countries are adopting<br />
sulfur control legislation that ranges from reduction of sulfur<br />
contents in oil products (e.g. China, Thailand, and India; see<br />
Streets et al., 2000), through a maximum sulfur content in coal<br />
(e.g. in China; see Streets and Waldhoff, 2000), to SO2 controls<br />
at coal-fired power plants (e.g. China, South Korea, Thailand;<br />
for a review see lEA, 1999). For instance, an estimated 3575<br />
MW of coal-fired electricity China is generated by plants<br />
already equipped with sulfur control devices (lEA, 1999).<br />
Since publication of the IS92 scenarios a number of important<br />
new sulfur impact studies have become available, and analyzed<br />
in particular:<br />
• Implications of acidic deposition levels of high SOj<br />
emissions scenarios such as IS92a (Amann et al., 1995;<br />
Posch etal, 1996).<br />
• Aggregate ecosystems impacts, especially whether<br />
critical loads for acidification are exceeded given<br />
deposition levels and different buffering capacities of<br />
soils (Amann et al., 1995; Posch et al, 1996).<br />
• Direct vegetation damage, particularly on food crops<br />
(Fischer and Rosenzweig, 1996).<br />
These studies provide further infomation on the impacts of<br />
high concentrations and deposition of SO2 emissions, beyond<br />
the well-documented impacts on human health, ecosystems<br />
productivity, and material damages (for reviews see Cratzen<br />
and Graedel, 1986; WHO and UNEP, 1993; WMO, 1997).<br />
These studies are particularly important because they<br />
document environmental changes of high-emission scenarios<br />
by using detailed representations of the numerous non-linear<br />
dose-response relationships between emissions, atmospheric<br />
concentrations, deposition, ecosystems sensitivity thresholds,<br />
and impacts. All recent studies agree that unabated high SOj<br />
emissions along the Hues of IS92a or even above would yield<br />
high impacts not only for natural ecosystems and forests, but<br />
also for economically important food crops and human health,<br />
especially in Asia where emissions growth is projected to be<br />
particularly high.<br />
A representative result (based on Amann et al, 1995) is shown<br />
in Figure 3-17, which contrasts 1990 European sulfur<br />
deposition levels with those of Asia by 2050 in a high SO2<br />
emission scenario (very close to IS 92a). Typically, in such<br />
scenarios, SO, emissions in Asia alone could surpass current<br />
global levels as early as 2020 (Amann et al, 1995; Posch et al,<br />
1996). Sulfur deposition above 5 g/m^ per year occurred in<br />
Europe in 1990 in the area of the borders of the Czech<br />
Republic, Poland, and Germany (the former GDR), often<br />
referred to as the "black triangle." In view of its ecological<br />
impacts it was officially designated by UNEP as an "ecological<br />
disaster zone." In a scenario such as IS92a (or even higher<br />
emissions), similar high sulfur deposition would occur by<br />
around 2020 over more than half of Eastern China, large parts<br />
of southern Korea, and some smaller parts of Thailand and<br />
southern Japan.<br />
Fischer and Rosenzweig (1996) assessed the combined impacts<br />
of climate change and acidification of agricultural crops in<br />
Asia for such a scenario. Their overall conclusion was that the<br />
projected likely regional climate change would largely benefit<br />
agricultural output in China, whereas it would lower<br />
agricultural productivity on the Indian subcontinent (the<br />
combined effect of projected temperature and precipitation<br />
changes would have differential impacts across various crops<br />
and subrogions). However, projected high levels of acidic<br />
deposition in China would reduce agricultural output to an