05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308 Summary Discussions and Recommendations<br />

40<br />

0 ' ^- ' ' ' ' ^ ' ^' '<br />

1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090<br />

Figure 6-7: Global CO2 emissions (GtC, standardized) from all sources for the four scenario families from 1990 to 2100.<br />

<strong>Scenarios</strong> are also presented for the four constituent groups of the Al family (high-coal AIC, high oil and gas AIG, high nonfossil<br />

fuel AIT, and the balanced AIB) and for the other three families (A2, Bl, and B2), forming seven scenario groups<br />

altogether. The emissions of AIC and AIG scenario groups are combined into AlFI (see footnote 2). Each colored emission<br />

band shows the range of the harmonized scenarios within one group that share common global input assumptions for<br />

population and GDP. The scenarios remaining outside the seven groups adopted altemative interpretations of the four scenario<br />

storylines.<br />

structure similar to the distribution of cumulative emissions<br />

from the scenarios in the literature. The groups of SRES<br />

scenarios span the whole range of cumulative emissions from<br />

the scenarios in the literature. The range of the four markers is<br />

from 1000 to 1900 GtC. In comparison, the IS92 cumulative<br />

emissions range from 700 GtC for IS92c to 2140 GtC for<br />

IS92e.<br />

The SRES emissions scenarios encompass emissions of other<br />

GHGs and chemically active species such as carbon<br />

monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and non-methane volatile organic<br />

compounds. The emissions of other gases follow dynamic<br />

patterns much like those shown in Figures 6-5 and 6-6 for<br />

CO2 emissions. Further details of GHG emissions are given in<br />

Chapter 5.<br />

6.3.2. Other Greenhouse Gases<br />

Of the GHGs, CO2 is the main contributor to anthropogenic<br />

radiative forcing because of changes in concentrations from<br />

pre-industrial times. According to Houghton et al. (1996) wellmixed<br />

GHGs (COj, CH4, NjO, and the halocarbons) induced<br />

additional radiative forcing of around 2.5 W/m^ on a global and<br />

annually averaged basis. COj accounted for 60% of the total,<br />

which indicates that the other GHGs are significant as well.<br />

Whereas COj emissions are by-and-large attributable to two<br />

major sources, energy consumption and land-use change, other<br />

emissions arise from many different sources and a large<br />

number of sectors and applications (e.g. see Table 5-3 in<br />

Chapter 5).<br />

The SRES emissions scenarios also have different emissions<br />

for other GHGs and chemically active species such as carbon<br />

monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and non-methane volatile organic<br />

compounds. The uncertainties that surround the emissions<br />

sources of these gases, and the more complex set of driving<br />

forces behind them aie considerable and unresolved. Hence,<br />

model projections of these gases are particularly uncertain and<br />

the scenarios presented here are no exception. Improved<br />

inventories and studies linking driving forces to changing<br />

emissions in order to improve the representation of these gases<br />

in global and regional emission models remain an important<br />

future research task. Therefore, the models and approaches

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!