05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

по Scenario Driving Forces<br />

IIASA Slow<br />

UN High<br />

UN Medium<br />

--«-- World Bauk<br />

IIASA Central<br />

UN Low<br />

2050 2075 2100 2150<br />

IIASA Rapid<br />

Figure 3-5: Projected world average TFRs from the UN, IIASA, and World Bank. The older 1994 World Bank projections are<br />

shown, because the latest (1996) projection methodology is not published. USCB fertility rates are not readily available and so<br />

are omitted. UN fertility assumptions are shown only for the 1996 Revision as full detail of the 1998 data were unavailable at<br />

the time of drafting this report.<br />

fertility assumption causes the projection to decline and to<br />

"hit" the World Bank and UN curves in 2100. This "overshoot"<br />

occurs because the IIASA central scenario assumptions rely on<br />

an expert poll conducted in 1993 (Lutz, 1994), whereas other<br />

projections incorporate more recent information into their<br />

future assumptions (more rapid recent fertility declines in<br />

many developing countries; see Courbage, 1998). However,<br />

among demographers disagreement persists on the timing and<br />

rates of demographic transition in the developing countries, in<br />

particular- between the demographers at IIASA and those at the<br />

UN and World Bank (see the discussion in Lutz, 1994) on the<br />

differences among altemative population projections). This<br />

disagreement reflects important uncertainties in the projection<br />

of future demographic developments. The beiow-replacement,<br />

long-term fertility level in the IIASA central estimate is a<br />

hallmark of the institute's work. Demographers at IIASA<br />

strongly adhere to the view that there is little reason to expect<br />

developed nations to return to replacement-level fertility, while<br />

much evidence suggests that low long-term rates will persist<br />

(Lutz et ai, 1996). One issue here, however, is that the TFR<br />

measure is currently depressed in Europe, in part because<br />

women are delaying their childbearing until later ages<br />

(Bongaarts, 1998). Thus, the TFR may rise if these women do<br />

have children, and such a conection has to be incoфol•ated into<br />

the long-term TFR assumptions (e.g., see Courbage, 1998).<br />

Important uncertainties are by how fast and how much the TFR<br />

will rise.<br />

3.2.33. Recent Developments in Demographic Projections<br />

3.2.3.3.1. Downward revisions in population projections<br />

The UN 1996 Revision generated substantial press attention in<br />

1997 because it forecast nearly 500 million fewer people in<br />

2050 than it had in 1994. The base year of data for the UN 1996<br />

Revision is 1995, whereas in the 1994 Revision fertility.<br />

mortality, and migration rates for 1995 are forecast. The<br />

reduction in the population projection largely results from<br />

more accurate data available for 1995 (UN, 1997b, 1997c). The<br />

major change was the lower-than-anticipated world average<br />

fertility of 2.96 children per woman during the period<br />

1990-1995, as compared with 3.10 children per woman<br />

assumed in the 1994 Revision. The main reason for this<br />

decrease is a faster-than-anticipated decline in fertility in a<br />

number of couniries in south central Asia, Bangladesh and<br />

India, and Sub-Saharan Africa, Kenya, and Rwanda (UN,<br />

1997c). Other important regional declines in fertility also took<br />

place in Brazil, the former Soviet republics, and the newly<br />

independent states in eastern and southern Europe (Haub,<br />

1997). Higher-than-anticipated mortality rates in a number of<br />

countries afflicted by wars and the spread of AIDS also<br />

contributed to the downward population revision.<br />

3.2.3.3.2. Demographic impact of the HIV and AIDS epidemic<br />

Both the UN and the Wofld Health Organization (WHO)<br />

conduct ongoing surveys of the global HIV (human<br />

immunodeficiency virus) and AIDS epidemic. The most recent<br />

surveys indicate that at the beginning of 1998 30.6 million<br />

people were infected with HIV, the vhus that causes AIDS, and<br />

11.7 million people have already lost their lives to the disease<br />

(UNAIDS and WHO, 1998).<br />

Since the impact of HIV and AIDS on mortality rates is<br />

greatest in the sub-Saharan region, the impact of the epidemic<br />

on population growth will be greatest there. One study<br />

(Bongaarts, 1996) suggests that by 2005 the annual population<br />

growth rates (expressed as "persons increase per thousand<br />

population") in sub-Saharan Africa will be about 1.4 persons<br />

per thousand lower than would have occurred in the absence of<br />

the disease. Other regions, however, will experience a much<br />

smaller impact in population growth so that the AIDS-related

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!