05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

300 Summary Discussions and Recommendations<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

2.5<br />

OECD90&REF<br />

IS92f<br />

A2 (OASA)<br />

-<br />

2.0 /<br />

- 1.5<br />

B2 (Ш)<br />

/'<br />

Bl. Al (11 AS A) /' /<br />

IS92a,b,e / /<br />

IS92f<br />

A2 (Í1ASA)<br />

в<br />

о<br />

и<br />

12<br />

10<br />

1.0<br />

^ 1 1 1 1<br />

IS92c,d / /<br />

0.5<br />

1900 1950 200П 2050 2100 / ' / '<br />

lS92a,b,e<br />

B2 (UN)<br />

о<br />

lô<br />

Bl, Al (HASA)<br />

Starting Point of à<br />

lS92c,d<br />

time horizon (1990)гГ<br />

World<br />

1 1 1<br />

1900 1950 2000 2050 2100<br />

Figure 6-2rPopulation projections -<br />

historical data from 1900 to 1990 (based<br />

on Durand, 1967; Demeny; 1990; UN,<br />

1998), SRES scenarios (based on Lutz,<br />

1996, for high and low, and UN, 1998,<br />

for medium), and <strong>IPCC</strong> IS92 scenarios<br />

(Leggett et al., 1992; Pepper et al.,<br />

1992) from 1990 to 2100.<br />

6.2.2. Economie Development<br />

The SRES scénarios span a wide range of future levels of<br />

economic activity (expressed in gross world product). The Al<br />

scenario family with a ("hannonized") gross world product of<br />

US$529 trillion (all values in 1990 US dollars unless otherwise<br />

indicated) in 2100 delineates the SRES upper bound, whereas<br />

B2 with ("harmonized") US$235 trillion in 2100 represents its<br />

lower bound. The range of gross world product across all<br />

scenarios is even higher, from US$197 to US$550 by 2100.<br />

Although the SRES scenarios span a wide range, still lower<br />

and higher gross world product levels can be found in the<br />

literature (see Chapters 2, 3, and 4). Uncertainties in future<br />

gross world product levels are governed by the pace of future<br />

productivity growth and population growth, especially in<br />

developing regions. Different assumptions on conditions and<br />

possibilities for development "catch-up" and for narrowing per<br />

capita income gaps in particular explain the wide range in<br />

projected future gross world product levels. Given a<br />

qualitatively negative relationship between population growth<br />

and per capita income growth discussed in Chapters 2 and 3,<br />

uncertainties in future population growth rates tend to narrow<br />

the range of associated gross world product projections. High<br />

population growth would, ceteris paribus, lower per capita<br />

income growth, whereas low population growth would tend to<br />

increase it. This relationship is evident in empiric data - high<br />

per capita income countries are generally also those that have<br />

completed then demographic transition. The affluent live long<br />

and generally have few children. (Exceptions are some<br />

countries with small populations, high birth rates, and<br />

significant income from commodity exports.) This relationship<br />

between affluence and longevity again identities development<br />

as one of the most important indicators of human well being.<br />

Yet even assuming this relationship holds for an extended time<br />

into the future, its quantification is subject to considerable<br />

theoretic and empiric uncertainties (Alcamo et al., 1995).<br />

Two of the SRES scenario families, Al and Bl, explicitly<br />

explore alternative pathways to gradually close existing<br />

income gaps. As a reflection of uncertainty, development<br />

"catch-up" diverges in terms of geographically distinct<br />

economic growth patterns across the four SRES scenario<br />

families. Table 6-1 summarizes per capita income for SRES<br />

and IS92 scenarios for the four SRES world regions. SRES<br />

scenarios indicate a smaller difference between the now<br />

industrialized and developing countries compared with the<br />

IS92 scenarios. This tendency toward a substantially narrower<br />

income "gap" compared with the IS92 scenarios overcomes<br />

one of the major shortcomings of the previous <strong>IPCC</strong> scenarios<br />

cited in the literature (Parikli, 1992).<br />

6.2.3. Structural and Technological Change<br />

In this brief summary of the SRES scenarios, structural and<br />

technological changes are illustrated by using energy and land<br />

use as examples. These examples are characteristic for the<br />

driving forces of emissions because the energy system and land<br />

use are the major sources of GHG and sulfur emission.<br />

Chapter 4 gives a more detailed treatment of the full range of<br />

emissions driving forces across the SRES scenarios.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!