Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
154<br />
Scenario Driving Forces<br />
the VOC Protocol of the UN Convention on Long-Range<br />
Transboundary Air Pollution. However, for reasons similar to<br />
those for NOj^, the cun'ent reduction of 11% with respect to<br />
1990 levels and 15% with respect to 1987 levels suggests that<br />
the plaimed reduction to 30% in 1999 may not be reached<br />
(EEA, 1999). As a consequence, threshold values for ozone<br />
continue to be exceeded in Europe.<br />
No long-term global scenarios for emissions of NMVOCs and<br />
CO were identified beyond IS92, which assumes increasing<br />
emissions. The important role of biomass combustion in these<br />
emissions means that a scenario with low carbon emissions<br />
because of an increased used of biomass energy does not<br />
automatically lead to low emissions of NMVOCs and CO.<br />
Also, emissions trends are influenced significantly by<br />
assumptions as to the type of combustion or other conversion<br />
technology (e.g. gasification) deployed in the future. If<br />
biomass fuel is used in modem large power plants or boilers, or<br />
is to be converted into modem energy carriers, CO emissions<br />
will be almost negligible compared to those of traditional uses.<br />
As with sulfur, however, it seems plausible that with rising<br />
incomes, abatement of the ozone precursors may be initiated in<br />
non-OECD regions to address local and particularly regional<br />
air pollution (photochemical smog). Since control of these<br />
substances is more difficult than that of sulfur, it may not be<br />
implemented until later.<br />
3.6.6. Halocarbons and Other Industrial Gases<br />
This category of GHG emissions comprises a wide basket of<br />
different gas species that originate from a multitude of<br />
processes. Generally, their common characteristic is that they<br />
are released into the atmosphere in comparatively small<br />
amounts, but on a molecular basis most of the gases are longlived,<br />
with atmospheric lifetimes up to 50,000 years. Generally<br />
they have a strong greenhouse forcing per molecule (see<br />
Chapter 5, Table 5-7).<br />
Anthropogenic emissions of gases that cause stratospheric<br />
ozone depletion (chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons<br />
(HCFCs), halons, methylchloroform, carbon<br />
tetrachloride, and methylbromide) are controlled by<br />
consumption restrictions (production plus imports minus<br />
exports) in the Montreal Protocol. No special SRES scenarios<br />
were developed for these gases because their future emission<br />
levels (phase out) are primarily policy driven and hence<br />
unrelated to scenario variations of important driving-force<br />
variables such as population, economic growth, or industrial<br />
output. Instead, the Montreal Protocol scenario (A3, maximum<br />
allowed production scenario) from the 1998 WMO/UNEP<br />
Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion is used<br />
(WMO/UNEP, 1998).<br />
The procedures for constructing scenarios for hydrofluorocarbon<br />
(HFC), polyfluorocarbon (PEC), and sulfur<br />
hexafluoride (SFg) emissions - for which there is an extreme<br />
paucity of scenario literature - are based on Fenhann (2000)<br />
and are described in greater detail in Chapter 5, Section 5.3.3.<br />
In this approach, future total demand for CFCs, HFCs, and<br />
other CFC substitutes is estimated on the basis of historical<br />
trends. HFC emissions are calculated using an assumed future<br />
replacement of CFCs by HFCs and other substitutes. The main<br />
drivers for the emissions are population and GDP growth. The<br />
sparse literature available (reviewed in Fenhann, 2000)<br />
indicates that emissions are related non-linearly to these<br />
driving forces, with important possibilities for saturation<br />
effects and long-term decoupling between growth in driving<br />
force variables and emissions. The emissions have been tuned<br />
to agree with emissions scenarios presented at the joint<br />
<strong>IPCC</strong>-TEAP expert meeting (WMO/UNER 1999). Material<br />
from the March Consulting Group (1999) has also been used.<br />
For PFCs (CF4 and C,Fg) the emissions driver is primary<br />
aluminum production, which is generally modeled using GDP<br />
and a consumption elasticity. Recycling rates are increasingly<br />
important, as reflected in the SRES scenarios (see Chapter 5).<br />
Aluminum production by the Soederberg process resulted, on<br />
average, in the emission of 0.45 kgCF^ per tAl and 0.02 kgC2Fg<br />
per tAl in 1998 in Norway. The effect of future technological<br />
change on the emissions factor can be assumed to be large,<br />
since the costs of modifications in process technology can be<br />
offset by the costs of saved energy. A considerable reduction in<br />
the emission factors has already taken place and the present<br />
emission factor of 0.5 kgCF^ per tAl is expected to fall to 0.15<br />
kgCF^ per tAl at various rates (see Chapter 5). An emission<br />
factor for C^Fg, 10 times lower than that of CF^ was used in the<br />
calculations. The present trend of not replacing CFCs and<br />
HCFCs with high global warming compounds like PFCs (or<br />
SF^) is also assumed to continue, which might underestimate<br />
the effect of future emissions. The only other source included<br />
for PEC emissions is semiconductor manufacturing, for which<br />
the industry has globally adopted a voluntary agreement to<br />
reduce its PEG emissions by 10% in 2010 relative to 1995<br />
levels.<br />
SFg emissions originate from two main activities - the use of<br />
SFg as a gas insulator in high-vohage electricity equipment,<br />
and its use in magnesium foundries, in which SFg prevents the<br />
oxidation of molten magnesium. The driver for the former is<br />
electricity demand and for the latter it is future magnesium<br />
production, which will depend on GDP and a consumption<br />
elasticity. Emission factor reductions over time that result from<br />
more careful handling, recovery, recycling, and substitution of<br />
SFg are assumed for both sources. Fenhann (2000) assumes<br />
that in low future scenarios SFg emissions factors decline to<br />
one-tenth their present values between 2020 and 2090. In high<br />
future scenarios, Fenhann (2000) assumes reduction levels are<br />
somewhat lower, ranging from 55% to 90% depending on the<br />
region. In the absence of scenario literature, these assumptions<br />
are retained here (see Chapter 5). Other applications of SFg<br />
include as a tracer gas in medical surgery and the production of<br />
semiconductors, and as an insulator in some windows.<br />
However, these sources are assumed to be cause less than 1%<br />
of the global emissions.