05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

154<br />

Scenario Driving Forces<br />

the VOC Protocol of the UN Convention on Long-Range<br />

Transboundary Air Pollution. However, for reasons similar to<br />

those for NOj^, the cun'ent reduction of 11% with respect to<br />

1990 levels and 15% with respect to 1987 levels suggests that<br />

the plaimed reduction to 30% in 1999 may not be reached<br />

(EEA, 1999). As a consequence, threshold values for ozone<br />

continue to be exceeded in Europe.<br />

No long-term global scenarios for emissions of NMVOCs and<br />

CO were identified beyond IS92, which assumes increasing<br />

emissions. The important role of biomass combustion in these<br />

emissions means that a scenario with low carbon emissions<br />

because of an increased used of biomass energy does not<br />

automatically lead to low emissions of NMVOCs and CO.<br />

Also, emissions trends are influenced significantly by<br />

assumptions as to the type of combustion or other conversion<br />

technology (e.g. gasification) deployed in the future. If<br />

biomass fuel is used in modem large power plants or boilers, or<br />

is to be converted into modem energy carriers, CO emissions<br />

will be almost negligible compared to those of traditional uses.<br />

As with sulfur, however, it seems plausible that with rising<br />

incomes, abatement of the ozone precursors may be initiated in<br />

non-OECD regions to address local and particularly regional<br />

air pollution (photochemical smog). Since control of these<br />

substances is more difficult than that of sulfur, it may not be<br />

implemented until later.<br />

3.6.6. Halocarbons and Other Industrial Gases<br />

This category of GHG emissions comprises a wide basket of<br />

different gas species that originate from a multitude of<br />

processes. Generally, their common characteristic is that they<br />

are released into the atmosphere in comparatively small<br />

amounts, but on a molecular basis most of the gases are longlived,<br />

with atmospheric lifetimes up to 50,000 years. Generally<br />

they have a strong greenhouse forcing per molecule (see<br />

Chapter 5, Table 5-7).<br />

Anthropogenic emissions of gases that cause stratospheric<br />

ozone depletion (chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons<br />

(HCFCs), halons, methylchloroform, carbon<br />

tetrachloride, and methylbromide) are controlled by<br />

consumption restrictions (production plus imports minus<br />

exports) in the Montreal Protocol. No special SRES scenarios<br />

were developed for these gases because their future emission<br />

levels (phase out) are primarily policy driven and hence<br />

unrelated to scenario variations of important driving-force<br />

variables such as population, economic growth, or industrial<br />

output. Instead, the Montreal Protocol scenario (A3, maximum<br />

allowed production scenario) from the 1998 WMO/UNEP<br />

Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion is used<br />

(WMO/UNEP, 1998).<br />

The procedures for constructing scenarios for hydrofluorocarbon<br />

(HFC), polyfluorocarbon (PEC), and sulfur<br />

hexafluoride (SFg) emissions - for which there is an extreme<br />

paucity of scenario literature - are based on Fenhann (2000)<br />

and are described in greater detail in Chapter 5, Section 5.3.3.<br />

In this approach, future total demand for CFCs, HFCs, and<br />

other CFC substitutes is estimated on the basis of historical<br />

trends. HFC emissions are calculated using an assumed future<br />

replacement of CFCs by HFCs and other substitutes. The main<br />

drivers for the emissions are population and GDP growth. The<br />

sparse literature available (reviewed in Fenhann, 2000)<br />

indicates that emissions are related non-linearly to these<br />

driving forces, with important possibilities for saturation<br />

effects and long-term decoupling between growth in driving<br />

force variables and emissions. The emissions have been tuned<br />

to agree with emissions scenarios presented at the joint<br />

<strong>IPCC</strong>-TEAP expert meeting (WMO/UNER 1999). Material<br />

from the March Consulting Group (1999) has also been used.<br />

For PFCs (CF4 and C,Fg) the emissions driver is primary<br />

aluminum production, which is generally modeled using GDP<br />

and a consumption elasticity. Recycling rates are increasingly<br />

important, as reflected in the SRES scenarios (see Chapter 5).<br />

Aluminum production by the Soederberg process resulted, on<br />

average, in the emission of 0.45 kgCF^ per tAl and 0.02 kgC2Fg<br />

per tAl in 1998 in Norway. The effect of future technological<br />

change on the emissions factor can be assumed to be large,<br />

since the costs of modifications in process technology can be<br />

offset by the costs of saved energy. A considerable reduction in<br />

the emission factors has already taken place and the present<br />

emission factor of 0.5 kgCF^ per tAl is expected to fall to 0.15<br />

kgCF^ per tAl at various rates (see Chapter 5). An emission<br />

factor for C^Fg, 10 times lower than that of CF^ was used in the<br />

calculations. The present trend of not replacing CFCs and<br />

HCFCs with high global warming compounds like PFCs (or<br />

SF^) is also assumed to continue, which might underestimate<br />

the effect of future emissions. The only other source included<br />

for PEC emissions is semiconductor manufacturing, for which<br />

the industry has globally adopted a voluntary agreement to<br />

reduce its PEG emissions by 10% in 2010 relative to 1995<br />

levels.<br />

SFg emissions originate from two main activities - the use of<br />

SFg as a gas insulator in high-vohage electricity equipment,<br />

and its use in magnesium foundries, in which SFg prevents the<br />

oxidation of molten magnesium. The driver for the former is<br />

electricity demand and for the latter it is future magnesium<br />

production, which will depend on GDP and a consumption<br />

elasticity. Emission factor reductions over time that result from<br />

more careful handling, recovery, recycling, and substitution of<br />

SFg are assumed for both sources. Fenhann (2000) assumes<br />

that in low future scenarios SFg emissions factors decline to<br />

one-tenth their present values between 2020 and 2090. In high<br />

future scenarios, Fenhann (2000) assumes reduction levels are<br />

somewhat lower, ranging from 55% to 90% depending on the<br />

region. In the absence of scenario literature, these assumptions<br />

are retained here (see Chapter 5). Other applications of SFg<br />

include as a tracer gas in medical surgery and the production of<br />

semiconductors, and as an insulator in some windows.<br />

However, these sources are assumed to be cause less than 1%<br />

of the global emissions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!