Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
268 Emission Scénarios<br />
assumes a 30% substkution by HFCs. However, in the SRES<br />
scénarios this value is reduced to 10% to remain consistent<br />
with the above assumption that HFCs ultimately will substitute<br />
for about 25% of the CFCs.<br />
As well as using non-halocarbon substitutes, HFC emissions<br />
can be avoided by better housekeeping, for instance by reduced<br />
spilling of cooling agents. Leakage control equipment can also<br />
serve this purpose. Finally, halocarbons can be recovered for<br />
recycling or destruction when equipment is discarded. Some of<br />
this emission reduction potential is likely to be implemented as<br />
a result of technological changes introduced to control ODSs.<br />
In the SRES scenarios, reduction rates were varied over time<br />
and between industrialized and developing countries to reflect<br />
the definitive features of the underlying storylines (Chapter 4).<br />
Generally, the reduction rates are assumed highest in scenarios<br />
that emphasize sustainability and environmental policies (Bl<br />
family). These reductions, however, were not associated with<br />
any explicit GHG reduction policies, as required by the SRES<br />
Terms of Reference (see Appendix I). In one scenario family,<br />
A2, no reductions were assumed, whereas in the Al and B2<br />
families reduction rates were set at intermediate levels.<br />
In addition to consumption-related emissions of HFCs, HFC-<br />
23 is emitted as an undesired by-product from the HCFC-22<br />
production process. As a result of the Montreal Protocol, the<br />
direct use of HCFC-22, and hence the related HFC-23<br />
emissions, will come to a halt in 2050. To calculate the HFC-<br />
23 emissions, information from Oram et al. (1998) was used<br />
(estimated emissions of HFC-23 at 6.4 kt in 1990). By relating<br />
this value to 178.1 kt HCFC-22 emitted in 1990 (WMO/UNEP,<br />
1999), an emissions factor of 0.036 tons of HFC-23 per ton of<br />
HCFC-22 was calculated and applied to estimate future<br />
emissions. Since this estimation procedure does not take into<br />
account any pollution control regulations (that are not driven<br />
by climate considerations), it may result in an overestimation<br />
of HFC-23 during the early decades of the 2P' century, until<br />
HCFC production is phased out under the Montreal Protocol.<br />
After the phase-out of HCFC-22 consumption, some HFC-23<br />
emissions will still occur because of the continued HCFC-22<br />
feedstock production allowed under the Montreal Protocol.<br />
The resultant projections are shown by individual HFC in Table<br />
5-8.<br />
In general, the SRES scenaiios might underestimate HFC<br />
emissions if the substitution of CFCs with altematives that<br />
have no radiative forcing effect and with more efficient HFCsbased<br />
technologies does not penetrate as quickly as is assumed,<br />
especially in developing countries. However, more effective<br />
technologies and/or suitable non-HFC altematives may be<br />
developed, which would lead to even lower emissions.<br />
5.4.3.2. Perfluorocarbons<br />
PFCs, fully fluorinated hydrocarbons, have extremely long<br />
atmospheric lifetimes (2600 to 50,000 years) and particularly<br />
high radiative forcing (Table 5-7). The production of aluminum<br />
is thought to be the largest source of PFCs (CF^, and CoFg )<br />
emissions. These emissions are generated, primarily, by the<br />
anode effect, which occurs during the reduction of alumina<br />
(aluminum oxide) in the primary smelting process as alumina<br />
concentrations become too low in the smelter. Under these<br />
conditions, the electrolysis cell voltage increases sharply to a<br />
level sufficient for bath electrolysis to replace alumina<br />
electrolysis. This causes substantial energy loss and the release<br />
of fluorine, which reacts with carbon to form CF^ and CjFg.<br />
In 1990, the total annual global primary aluminum production<br />
was 19.4 Mt. Secondary aluminum production from recycling<br />
accounted for 21.5% of the total consumption in 1990. The<br />
production statistics from the World Bureau of Metal Statistics<br />
(1997) show that the total aluminum production was 27.5 Mt,<br />
and recycling has increased to 25.6%, or by about 3.5<br />
percentage points, in 10 years.<br />
The scenarios developed by Fenhann (2000) adopt a<br />
methodology of projecting future aluminum demand based on:<br />
• Aluminum consumption elasticity with respect to GDP.<br />
• Use of altemative assumptions conceming recycling<br />
rates.<br />
• Varying emission factors to reflect future technological<br />
change.<br />
These assumptions are altered to be in consistent with the four<br />
SRES scenario storylines described in Chapter 4.<br />
For instance, in Fenhann (2000) the aluminum consumption<br />
elasticity varies between 0.8 and 0.96, and the range of<br />
increases in aluminum recycling rates varies between 1.5 and<br />
3.5 percentage points per decade. The RFC emission factor<br />
varies according to the aluminum production technology used.<br />
The default emission factor from the Revised <strong>IPCC</strong> Guidelines<br />
(<strong>IPCC</strong>, 1997) is 1.4 kgCF/ aluminum. However, Hamisch<br />
(1999) gives evidence that the average specific emissions of<br />
CF4 per ton of aluminum has decreased from about 1.0 kg to<br />
0.5 kg between 1985 and 1995. Accordingly, an emissions<br />
factor of 0.8 kgCF^/t was used for 1990 and this was assumed<br />
to decrease to 0.5 kg CFyt in the future. This is also in<br />
agreement with the value of 0.51 kgCF^/t recommended by the<br />
<strong>IPCC</strong> Expert Meeting on Good Practices in Inventory<br />
Preparation for Industrial Processes and the New Gases<br />
(January 1999, Washington, DC). The same sources also agree<br />
on an emission factor for C^Fg that is 10 times lower than that<br />
for CF4. This assumption was also used in the calculations<br />
presented here (Table 5-8).<br />
Aluminum production is being upgraded from highly<br />
inefficient smelters and practices to reduce the frequency and<br />
duration of the anode effect. Since aluminum smelters are large<br />
consumers of energy, the costs of these modifications are offset<br />
by savings in energy costs and are therefore assumed to occur<br />
in all scenarios. The ultimate reduction of the anode eiïect<br />
frequency and duration was assumed to reach the same level in<br />
all the SRES scenarios. However, scenarios vary with respect<br />
to the rate of introducing the underlying modifications. It is