05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scenario Driving Forces 151<br />

(a)<br />

Sulfur deposition (g/yr/m^)<br />

0 - 1 1-5 H i > 5<br />

199A) are projected to rise above that level. Interestingly, all<br />

long-term sulfur scenarios published since 1995 do not judge<br />

this to be a likely (not to mention environmentally desirable)<br />

possibility. Representative sulfur-emissions control and<br />

intervention scenarios (Amann et al., 1995; Posch et al., 1996;<br />

Nakicenovic et ah, 1998a) suggest instead an upper range of<br />

global emissions below 100 MtS by 2050 and below 120 MtS by<br />

2100, a range covered in the two low variants IS92c and IS92d<br />

only. These patterns were also confiimed by Pepper et al. (1998)<br />

in a recent re-analysis of the previous IS92 scenarios. Using the<br />

same methodology as deployed in developing the IS92<br />

scenarios, the revised scenarios have maximum global SO,<br />

emissions below 142 MtS by 2020, and 56 MtS by 2100 (EPA3<br />

and EPA5 scenarios, respectively). The median from the more<br />

recent scenario hterature analyzed in Grübler (1998c) indicates<br />

near-constant global SO2 emissions - 77 MtS by 2020, 68 MtS<br />

by 2060, and 57 MtS by 2100. This global stability, however,<br />

masks decisive regional differences (discussed above).<br />

<strong>Emissions</strong> in the OECD countries will continue their declining<br />

trends in line with their sulfur reduction policies. <strong>Emissions</strong><br />

outside OECD will rise initially with increasing energy demand,<br />

but sulfur controls will be progressively phased in to mitigate<br />

against impacts of high unabated SO, emissions on health,<br />

agriculture, ecosystems, and tourism.<br />

Figure 3-17: Current sulfur deposition in Europe (a) and<br />

projections for a high growth, coal-intensive scenario similar<br />

to IS92a for Asia in 2020 (b), in gS/ml Source: Grübler,<br />

1998c, based on Amann et al., 1995.<br />

extent that would more than offset any possible beneficial<br />

impacts of regional climate change. This is primarily because<br />

sulfur (and nitrogen) deposition, while acting as fertilizer for<br />

plant growth at lower deposition levels, negatively affects plant<br />

growth at higher deposition levels. Projections in a scenario<br />

such as IS92a are that the threshold levels will be surpassed<br />

between 2020 and 2050 for all major Asian food crops.<br />

The review of recent literature on acidification impact studies<br />

given in Grubler (1998c) concludes that the impacts on human<br />

health, on economically important food crops, and on<br />

ecosystems are so substantial as to lender any scenario with<br />

SOj emissions as high as, or higher than, IS92a very unlikely.<br />

Grübler (1998c) canied out a detailed comparison of SOj<br />

emissions scenarios at the global and regional level. He<br />

concluded that the range of future SOj emissions spanned by<br />

the previous high-demand <strong>IPCC</strong> scenarios (all IS92 scenarios<br />

except IS92c and IS92d) corresponded well with scenarios<br />

available in the literature that do not include any direct sulfuremissions<br />

control or indirect intervention measures and policies<br />

(Figure 3-18). Typically, in such scenarios, global SOj<br />

emissions could rise to between 130 and 250 MtS by 2100, and<br />

in some older scenarios (Matsuoka et al., 1994; Morita et al..<br />

The need to abate local air pollution, including SO, emissions,<br />

is not only environmental, but also economic. For example,<br />

according to the World Bank (1997c, I997d) the current<br />

damage by environmental pollution is about 8% of GDP in<br />

China (and up to 20% of production in urban areas), while<br />

abatement costs would be between I and 2.5% of GDP.<br />

According to one World Bank (1997c) report, the costs are '"so<br />

high under the business-as-usual scenario that it is hardly<br />

necessary to consider the amenity and ecosystem benefits of<br />

cleaner air to justify action." Therefore, it is no surprise that in<br />

several developing regions, policies are already being<br />

developed and implemented to abate SOj emissions, in China,<br />

by 1995 coal-cleaning technology had been developed, and<br />

de-sulfurizing technology introduced and applied<br />

(Government of People's Republic of China, 1996). The SO2<br />

emissions target set by the Chinese government is 12.3 MtS by<br />

2000 as compared to 11.9 MtS in 1995. Economic<br />

instruments, such as pollution charges, pricing policy,<br />

favorable terms of investment for environmental technology,<br />

market creation, and ecological compensation fees, are being<br />

introduced in China now (UNEP, 1999). By June 1997, some<br />

64,000 enteфrises with heavy pollutant emissions had been<br />

closed for refurbishment or had ceased production. As a<br />

consequence, ambient concentrations of sulfur have been<br />

relatively stable in medium-size and small cities, and they<br />

have actually decreased in large cities. This change is<br />

occurring at significantly lower levels of income as compared<br />

to income levels in the USA and Europe at the time when their<br />

sulfur abatement started.<br />

In India, several sulfur policies are being introduced currently,<br />

including mandatory washing of coal used 500 km away from<br />

the mine mouth, a policy that is expected to significantly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!