05.03.2014 Views

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

Emissions Scenarios - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emission <strong>Scenarios</strong> 279<br />

Box 5-4: Future Sulfur Dioxide <strong>Emissions</strong> in tlie B2 Marker Scenario<br />

Future global emissions of SOj are generally lower across the SRES emissions scenarios compared to most earlier projections,<br />

because of three factors:<br />

• Switch to cleaner fuels, such as natural gas and renewable sources.<br />

• Transition to cleaner, more efficient coal technologies, such as IGCC generation and pressurized FBC.<br />

• Utilization of direct emissions-reduction technologies, such as FGD.<br />

The scope of reductions from fuel switching is illustrated by the following. At present, 60% of anthropogenic SO, emissions in<br />

developing regions are from the direct use of fossil fuels in buildings and industry (Smith et al., 2000). Reductions in these<br />

emissions will be realized by shifting from an energy stmcture that relies on the direct use of solid fuels to one that increasingly<br />

relies on distributed energy grids (electricity, natural gas, etc.). This shift, and a resultant decrease in SO^ emissions, has already<br />

occurred m Europe and North America. Further reductions are expected m the future as more efficient, and inherently low<br />

emission, fossil fuel technologies (such as IGCC) become commercialized. Explicit policies for sulfur emissions reductions,<br />

such as the use of FGD devices, will be needed to meet emissions targets in the near term, but are likely to be less necessary in<br />

the longer term.<br />

To illustrate these trends and the resultant decrease in SOj emissions over the 2P' century, emissions in the B2-MESSAGE<br />

scenario (Riahi and Roehil, 2000) are analyzed. Global energy-related SO^ emissions m this B2 scenario decline from 59 MtS<br />

in 1990 to about 12 MtS in 2100. The primaiy causes for this reduction are the transition to more advanced coal technologies<br />

and desulfurization. Consistent with the characteristics of gradual change in the B2 storyline, the aggregated emissions<br />

coefficient'^ for power production from coal declmes from about 5.3 kgS/MWh in 1990 to 0.04 kgS/MWh in the year 2100.<br />

The latter emissions intensity is similar to that of the most advanced current technologies, for example, the Siemens IGCC98<br />

power plant featuring 0.032 kgS/MWh (Baumann et al., 1998). In the second half of the 2P' century, desulfurization of the<br />

energy system also takes place because of the production of methanol from coal. Sulfur removal is a process-inherent featare.<br />

Methanol is mainly used in the transport sector as a substitute for оП products that become scarce after 2050.<br />

The percentage reductions m energy-related SO2 emissions in the B2 scenaiio are shown in Table 5-12 as a function of time for<br />

five technologies. These percentages were obtained by re-calculating the B2-MESSAGE emissions scenario with the energy<br />

structure and emissions coefficients held constant in time at those of 1990. In this hypothetical case, SOj emissions in 2100<br />

would be 227 MtS. Accordingly, energy-related SO^ emissions in 2100 are reduced by about 215 MtS in the B2 scenario, 68%<br />

of which results from technological change and 32% from fuel switchmg. By the year 2100 the contribution to these emissions<br />

reductions by flue-gas scrubbing (FGD) is negligible by the year 2100, because more-advanced coal technologies eliminate any<br />

need for it. Furthermore, a shift m refining technology to lighter oil products, currently underway worldwide, contributes to a<br />

reduction m SO, emissions, particularly in the early part of the 2P' century.<br />

Table 5-12: Sources of energy-related SO2 emissions reductions in the B2 marker scenario.<br />

Year Scrubbing IGCC Synfuel Light oil shift Fuel switching Total reduction<br />

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (MtS)<br />

1990 100 0 0 0 0 5.1<br />

2020 26 16 0 24 33 58.6<br />

2050 11 15 2 17 54 128.9<br />

Following the Bl storyline, in the Bl-IMAGE marker the<br />

emphasis is on global solutions to environmental sustainability<br />

and improved welfare and development equity. High<br />

technological development rates in the renewable energy sector<br />

result in a continued structural shift away from fossil fuels.<br />

All emissions coefficients were calculated with the MESSAGE<br />

model.<br />

Combined with dematerialization of the economy and with the<br />

most pronounced sulfur mitigation measures assumed among the<br />

SRES scenarios, this results in emissions that peak around 2020<br />

and subsequentiy decline continuously to 2100 (Figure 5-12).<br />

In the B2 scenario family, and thus in the B2-MESSAGE<br />

marker, strong emphasis is placed on regional environmental<br />

protection. Dynamics of technological change continue along<br />

historical trends ("dynamics as usual"), which are slower than

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!