Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
An Overview of <strong>Scenarios</strong> 173<br />
• Degree to which human and natural resources are<br />
mobilized globally and regionally to achieve multiple<br />
development objectives of each storyline.<br />
• Balance of economic, social, technological, or<br />
environmental objectives in the choices made by<br />
consumers, governments, enterprises, and other<br />
stakeholders.<br />
Thus, the storyliires describe developments in many different<br />
economic, technical, environmental, and social dimensions.<br />
Consequently, they occupy a multidimensional space and no<br />
simple metric can be used to classify them. Even though they<br />
occupy such a multidimensional space along many driving<br />
forces relevant for GHG emissions, it is useful here to highlight<br />
just two dimensions. The fnst refers to the extent of economic<br />
convergence and social and cultural interactions across the<br />
regions and the second to the balance between economic<br />
objectives and environmental and equity objectives. Possible<br />
names for these two dimensions could be "globalization" (Box<br />
4-3) and "sustainability," respectively (Box 4-4). As these two<br />
expressions are not necessarily viewed by everyone as being<br />
value-free, the two dimensions could alternatively be<br />
designated simply as a more global or more regional<br />
orientation and as a more economic or a more environmental<br />
orientation (see Figure 4-1). These dimensions are important in<br />
the SRES scenarios. Nevertheless, there was considerable<br />
resistance in the SRES writing team against such a simplistic<br />
classification of storylines, so it is presented here for<br />
illustrative purposes only. These distinctions are, in a sense,<br />
artificial. For example, both economic and environmental<br />
objectives are pursued in all scenarios, albeit with different<br />
levels of relative emphasis.<br />
The extent to which the currently observed global and regional<br />
orientations will prevail in the 2P' century is pertinent to the<br />
distinction between the Al and Bl scenario families on one<br />
side and A2 and B2 families on the other side. While the Al<br />
and Bl storylines, to different degrees, emphasize successful<br />
Box 4-3: Globalization Issues<br />
With Ihe convergence ш governments' economic policies m the<br />
1990s, combined with the rapid development of communication<br />
networks, it is perhaps not surprising that an extensive poll of<br />
scenarios by the Millennium Institute suggested "globalization"<br />
as the main driving force that will shape the future (Gleim and<br />
Gordon, 1997,1999). However, some scenarios in the hterature<br />
explore the possibiUty that unfettered markets, usually seen as<br />
an mtegral element of "globalization," might destabilize society<br />
in ways that endanger the process (Mohan Rao, 1998). In<br />
UNESCO's 1998 Worid Culture Report, it is noted that<br />
communities are increasingly emphasizing their cultural<br />
individuality; meanwhile, communication and travel are<br />
resultmg in interactions between communities that result m the<br />
evolution of new "local" cultures (UNESCO, 1998).<br />
Huntington (1996) asserts that continental regional cultures<br />
may determine the shape of future geopolitical developments<br />
rather than globahzation.<br />
Box 4-4: Sustainability Issues<br />
Recent decades have seen considerable growth in discourse<br />
of environmental and social issues, represented at the global<br />
level by several high-level United Nations (UN) meetings on<br />
social and economic development and environmental<br />
sustainability (UNCED, 1992; UN, 1994,1995; Leach, 1998;<br />
Mnnasinghe and Swart,2000). The range of participants has<br />
expanded from the most closely involved govertmient<br />
ministries, businesses, and envirormiental NGOs to include a<br />
broad range of representation by different ministries, local<br />
government, businesses, professions, and community groups.<br />
Increased interest in sustainability issues can lead to all kinds<br />
of socio-economic and technological changes that may not be<br />
aimed explicitly at reducing GHG emissions, but which may<br />
in effect contribute significantly to such reductions.<br />
economic global convergence and social and cultural<br />
interactions, A2 and B2 focus on a blossoming of diverse<br />
regional development pathways (see Box 4-3).<br />
The extent to which the currentiy observed economic and<br />
environmental orientations will prevail in the 2P' century is<br />
pertinent to the distinction between Al and A2 scenario<br />
families on one side and Bl and B2 scenario families on the<br />
other side. In the Bl and B2 storylines this transition is<br />
pursued, to different degrees, through a successful translation<br />
of global concerns into local actions to promote environmental<br />
sustainability. Altematively, in the Al and A2 storyhnes the<br />
emphasis remains, again to different degrees, on sustained<br />
economic development and achievement of high levels of<br />
affluence throughout the world, where environmental priorities<br />
are perceived as less important than those of economic<br />
development (see Box 4-4).<br />
In short, each of the storylines can be summarized as follows:<br />
• The AI storyline and scenario family describes a future<br />
world of very rapid economic growth, low population<br />
growth, and the rapid inttoduction of new and more<br />
efficient technologies. Major underlying themes are<br />
convergence among regions, capacity building, and<br />
increased cultural and social interactions, with a<br />
substantial reduction in regional differences in per<br />
capita income. The AI scenario family develops into<br />
four groups that describe altemative directions of<br />
technological change in the energy system.'<br />
' During the approval process of the Summary for Policymakers at<br />
the 5th Session of WGIII of the <strong>IPCC</strong> from 8-11 March 2000 in<br />
Katmandu, Nepal, it was decided to combine two of thiese groups (<br />
AlC and AIG) into one "fossil intensive" group AlFI, in contrast to<br />
the non-fossil group AIT, and to select two illustrative scenarios<br />
from these two Al groups to facilitate use by modelers and policy<br />
makers. This leads to six scenario groups that constitute the four<br />
scenario families, three of which are in the Al family. All scenarios<br />
are equally sound.