Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Emissions Scenarios - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
156 Scenario Driving Forces<br />
contribute to national goals for security, food and energy<br />
supply, high employment, and long-term economic growth<br />
(Maddison, 1995). The encouragement may take many forms,<br />
such as direct subsidies and protection from foreign<br />
competition, public investment in infrastructure, training, or<br />
R&D, and support for collaborative development programs<br />
and information networks (OECD, 1997a). If governments<br />
support sectors that are fossil-fuel intensive, the tendency to<br />
increase GHG emissions is clear. However, protectionist<br />
policies may also reduce national economic efficiency, which<br />
dampens income growth and tends to restrict growth in GHG<br />
emissions. Conversely, if governments support the<br />
development of rapid-growth sectors, the tendency may be to<br />
promote long-term economic growth, increase household<br />
income and consumpfion, and hence increase GHG<br />
emissions.<br />
Over a period of 100 years the policies that most influence the<br />
development of GHG emissions are probably those that<br />
contribute to the processes of technical and social innovation,<br />
which themselves contribute to economic development.<br />
Innovation policies mostly emphasize the development of<br />
technologies that improve intemational competitiveness with<br />
new products and improved performance or reduced costs of<br />
existing products. The policies are not usually designed to<br />
achieve these and other (e.g., environmental and social)<br />
objectives in an integrated way (OECD, 1998b). Hence, their<br />
impact on GHG emissions is hard to predict, but as cunently<br />
constituted many national systems for innovation could tend to<br />
increase emissions by sfimulating economic growth.<br />
3.7.2.3. Energy, Agriculture and Other Resource Management<br />
Policies<br />
Government policies on energy and agriculture have, on the<br />
whole, paralleled global trends during the 20* century. Early in<br />
the century there was a move toward protectionism, which<br />
aimed to secure national self-sufficiency, especially in food and<br />
energy. Govemments established import quotas and tariffs,<br />
subsidies for domestic production, and research and investment<br />
programs to improve agricultural productivity and develop new<br />
energy sources. During the 1980s policy emphasis shifted in<br />
many countries, and has continued into the 1990s, toward open<br />
borders and reduced subsidies and R&D. Nonetheless,<br />
numerous energy and agricultural policies persist that<br />
influence production and trade pattems and hence also GHG<br />
emissions.<br />
3.7.2.3.1. Energy policies<br />
Various policies exist to promote energy efficiency and the<br />
adoption of energy-efficient technologies and practices.<br />
Govemment standards, such as appliance efficiency standards,<br />
motors standards, and the automobile fuel economy standards<br />
in the US, prescribe the energy consumption levels of<br />
particular commodities. Residential and commercial building<br />
standards require the use of energy-efficient construction<br />
practices and components. Information dissemination<br />
programs, such as the Green Lights program in the USA or<br />
similar programs in other countries, provide consumers with<br />
the information required to make purchase decisions as well as<br />
to install and operate energy-efficient equipment. Subsidy or<br />
investment credit programs are often used to promote the<br />
adoption of a particular technology; combined heat and power<br />
was promoted in The Netherlands through such a program in<br />
the 1980s (Parla and Blok, 1995). Other energy efficiency<br />
policies or programs include audits and assessments, rebate<br />
programs, govemment procurement programs, benchmarking<br />
programs, labeling programs, and technology demonstration<br />
programs (Worrell etal., 1997).<br />
Many reports point to govemment subsidies as a major<br />
impediment to cleaner production of energy (Bumiaux et al,<br />
1992; Larsen and Shah, 1992; de Moor and Calamai, 1996;<br />
Roodman, 1996; Greenpeace, 1997). In addition to direct<br />
subsidies, govemments use a wide variety of measures to<br />
support domestic or regional industries, or to protect legal<br />
monopolies. These policies inhibit innovation and can lead to<br />
higher levels of pollution or resource intensity than would<br />
occur in a less constrained market. A recent OECD study found<br />
that reform of supports to coal, electricity, and transport could<br />
substantially reduce COj and acid rain emissions in some<br />
countries (OECD, 1997a). In other countries, subsidy reform<br />
would have minimal direct environmental benefits, but would<br />
increase the effectiveness or reduce the cost of environmental<br />
policies such as eco-taxes and emission limits. Where subsidies<br />
support nuclear power or other non-fossil energy sources, their<br />
reform could conversely lead to increased GHG emissions.<br />
Energy taxes also have an important influence on energy<br />
demand and hence GHG emissions. The majority of energy<br />
taxes are intended as a pure fiscal instrument or, in the case of<br />
road fuel taxes in some countries, to raise funds for road<br />
provision and maintenance. Many countries are raising these<br />
taxes, or considering doing so.<br />
3.7.2.3.2. Agriculture policies<br />
Agricultural policy reform has received more attention than<br />
energy policy reform in recent years. Most OECD countries<br />
support domestic agriculture, whether through direct subsidies,<br />
import tariffs, or price controls. The general trend is toward a<br />
reduction in these supports, in part as a result of tiade<br />
negotiations, but also as part of the broader trend toward<br />
policies that reduce budget deficits and improve market<br />
efficiency. Supports are also being reformed to reduce their<br />
linkage to production volumes. Where subsidies are linked to<br />
the volume of production, they provide an incentive to increase<br />
output beyond the level of demand, which leads to surpluses.<br />
This incentive may tend to increase GHG emissions as a result<br />
of soil carbon depletion and oxidation, excessive use of<br />
nitrogen fertilizer leading to N2O emissions, and over-intensive<br />
animal farming that results in excess CH^ emissions from<br />
manure and from the animals themselves (OECD, 1997b;<br />
Storey, 1997). The overall impact of agriculture subsidy<br />
reforms on GHG emissions will depend on associated fiscal<br />
changes in other parts of the economy.