05.01.2013 Views

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Daniel VACHKOV: The Changeover in Bulgaria in 1947 as a Form <strong>of</strong> Financial Repression 169<br />

a supporter <strong>of</strong> the regime, member <strong>of</strong> the so called ‘Zveno’ (Unit), considered a partner<br />

party represented in the ruling coalition. Only the fact that in March 1946, during a<br />

lecture he delivered to the economic society (later published in his magazine) he<br />

expressed a reserved criticism <strong>of</strong> the government financial policy and took the liberty to<br />

note that the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the Soviet occupation troops cost a lot more than the support<br />

<strong>of</strong> Germany before 1944, put an end to his academic career and soon after led him to the<br />

hell <strong>of</strong> being arrested, investigated and sent to the camp in Belene vi . The concrete<br />

example <strong>of</strong> the crackdown on Pr<strong>of</strong>. Hrist<strong>of</strong>orov shows eloquently that the new<br />

government did not need in-depth scientific analyses to solve economic problems and<br />

was ready to use its own methods <strong>of</strong> dealing with the crisis. So, in order to avoid the<br />

emerging total collapse <strong>of</strong> the state finances the regime resorted to drastic measures<br />

which no Bulgarian government had so far decided to impose. The idea was to sharply<br />

limit the amount <strong>of</strong> banknote circulation and thus control the inflationary spiral and create<br />

conditions for facilitating domestic government debt. However, all this had to be done at<br />

the expense <strong>of</strong> the cash resources <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

After the peace treaty was signed, the government felt free to begin the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> his radical monetary policy. Observing complete secrecy, prepared was an exchange <strong>of</strong><br />

the banknotes in circulation without resorting to denomination – i.e. seized were only the<br />

old banknotes, while the value <strong>of</strong> money was preserved. From 10 to 16 March 1947<br />

withdrawn from circulation were the banknotes <strong>of</strong> all emissions <strong>of</strong> 200, 250, 500, 1000<br />

and 5000 Levs and all 3% <strong>of</strong> treasury bills. The conditions under which the exchange was<br />

made were extremely severe for the citizens. From the old banknotes and treasury bills<br />

presented by the population exchanged were only 2,000 Levs per person (this is a<br />

negligible amount – less than $ 4 – my note D.V.) and the rest <strong>of</strong> the money went to a<br />

blocked deposit <strong>of</strong> the exchanger vii . Then the blocked accounts were charged, subject to<br />

the Law on the property tax specifically adopted for the occasion. The tax rates imposed<br />

under this law virtually provided the seizure by the State <strong>of</strong> a significant part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population's money. The amounts <strong>of</strong> up to 15,000 Levs were exempt from taxation, while<br />

the tax rates above it quickly increased. For example, deposits <strong>of</strong> over 200,000 Levs<br />

(approximately $ 400) were taxed at 25%, and those over 2 million already at 70% viii .<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the financial operation were as follows: the banks forcibly collected much<br />

<strong>of</strong> the money <strong>of</strong> the population; removed from use were the treasury bills which were<br />

previously used, due to their considerable volume, as means <strong>of</strong> payment; severely limited<br />

was the volume <strong>of</strong> banknotes in circulation. For the scale <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> monetary<br />

resources <strong>of</strong> the population informative are the <strong>of</strong>ficial data <strong>of</strong> the BNB. Before the<br />

changeover, in circulation and in the banks there were 39 billion Levs in banknotes and<br />

31 billion Levs in 3% treasury bills. From the total <strong>of</strong> 70 billion Levs owned by the<br />

population and the state and private enterprises seized were 69 billion Levs. After the<br />

changeover, the entire amount <strong>of</strong> money in circulation was reduced to 21 billion Levs,<br />

which included only the new banknotes. The weights <strong>of</strong> the changeover were incurred<br />

mainly by the ordinary people; forcibly collected from them were more than 49.5 billion<br />

Levs ix . The main effect <strong>of</strong> the described government policy was to create conditions for<br />

stabilization <strong>of</strong> the finances at the cost <strong>of</strong> cruel elimination <strong>of</strong> the savings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population and a drop in its purchasing power.<br />

Shocked by this government initiative, the western diplomats present in Bulgaria voiced<br />

strong protests against the way in which the changeover was carried out. Diplomatic<br />

correspondence provides descriptions <strong>of</strong> many cases where Bulgarian citizens resorted to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!