05.01.2013 Views

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lora DONCHEVA: The Democratic Alternative for the Development <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria… 215<br />

Constitutionalism is revealed in the consistent and comprehensive proclamation <strong>of</strong> human<br />

rights and freedoms, in the precise determination <strong>of</strong> the limits <strong>of</strong> interference by the state with<br />

respect to the citizens’ autonomy. In all drafts by the opposition comprehensively and<br />

thoroughly are set forth the personal, political and social rights <strong>of</strong> citizens.<br />

The freedom and inviolability <strong>of</strong> the person are bound by the constitutional prohibition<br />

for passing retroactive penal laws, setting up <strong>of</strong> exclusive courts, concentration camps<br />

and forced labour education homes, guaranteeing the secrecy <strong>of</strong> correspondence and<br />

inviolability <strong>of</strong> the home. Penal liability is personal and no person can be punished<br />

without a sentence passed by the respective court, which has become effective. Tortures<br />

<strong>of</strong> any form and any accusation are explicitly prohibited, as well as the confiscation <strong>of</strong><br />

property as punishment for any committed <strong>of</strong>fence. In the draft by BZNS-NP there is a<br />

text, which excludes the death penalty iii and in the draft by Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. Ganev, the death<br />

penalty is permitted only in case <strong>of</strong> martial law, but even then it is impermissible for<br />

political crimes iv .<br />

The right <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and press is clearly and unambiguously stipulated,<br />

bound by the prohibition <strong>of</strong> censorship <strong>of</strong> any form. The right to association and<br />

organization is guaranteed without asking the respective authorities for preliminary<br />

permission, as long as their aims and means are not contradictory to the Constitution and<br />

the state and public order. As a fundamental right is defined the freedom to assemble<br />

peacefully without any arms, without being obliged to ask any authority for preliminary<br />

permission. In the draft by the DP there is a text, prohibiting coercive persuasion on the<br />

citizens for membership in organizations and associations in order to enjoy their right to<br />

work, or to be awarded with “certain benefits and advantages <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional, economic<br />

or <strong>of</strong>ficial character” v .<br />

The drafts by the opposition also lay down the fundamental social rights <strong>of</strong> the citizens.<br />

They provide for compulsory and free basic education, ensuring equal and free access to<br />

universities without any restrictions on the grounds <strong>of</strong> nationality, religious or political<br />

affiliations (art. 79 <strong>of</strong> the draft by Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. Ganev) vi . Art. 101 <strong>of</strong> the draft by BZNS-NP<br />

defines education as “free and democratic” vii , and art. 121 <strong>of</strong> the draft by the DP<br />

recognizes the scientific and administrative autonomy <strong>of</strong> universities viii . The right to work<br />

and employment is related to the freedom <strong>of</strong> the citizens to choose for themselves their<br />

occupation and work (art. 122 <strong>of</strong> the draft by the DP) ix , as compulsory attachment to<br />

farms, factories or institutions (art. 96 <strong>of</strong> the draft by BZNS-NP) x . In all drafts by the<br />

opposition, the protection <strong>of</strong> the right to work is guaranteed by the right to trade union<br />

actions, including the right to strikes within the limits <strong>of</strong> the law.<br />

The democratic spirit is seen in determining the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the state when civil<br />

rights and freedoms are infringed. Art. 89 <strong>of</strong> the draft by Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. Ganev underlines that<br />

the rights and freedoms, enshrined in the Constitution, cannot be “restricted, limited or<br />

impaired” by any legal or administrative acts by state authorities or actions <strong>of</strong> individuals.<br />

Any encroachment on the rights and freedoms <strong>of</strong> the citizens is indictable. It is explicitly<br />

stipulated that any criminal <strong>of</strong>fences committed against the personal inviolability, which<br />

are related to torture and violence against the detained person, “shall not prescribe with<br />

time, shall not be amnestied and those convicted <strong>of</strong> such <strong>of</strong>fences may not be pardoned”<br />

xi . Though more briefly, art. 116 <strong>of</strong> the constitution draft by BZNS-NP clearly states that<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences against personal inviolability, accompanied by violence against the detained, as<br />

well as those in case <strong>of</strong> elections or referendum “shall not lapse by prescription, the<br />

actions shall not be amnesties and the convicted persons may not be pardoned” xii .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!