05.01.2013 Views

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lora DONCHEVA: The Group <strong>of</strong> Immigrant Anarchists … 33<br />

the resistance against the regime based on the research <strong>of</strong> papers stored in the Archives<br />

“V. Momchev ". The report also aims to reveal new details about organization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mission and to present the view <strong>of</strong> the only one that survived (D. Karaivanov) about the<br />

reasons that caused failure.<br />

Increasing repression against the opposition in Bulgaria after 1947 increased the count<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bulgarian political emigrants in Western Europe. In 1950 in Paris was found the Union<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bulgarian Overseas Anarchist – an organization <strong>of</strong> the Bulgarian anarchists that<br />

emigrated from Bulgaria after the strike upon their movement on the eve <strong>of</strong> the Fifth<br />

Congress <strong>of</strong> the BWPc (Bulgarian Workers’ Party – communists) in December 1948. The<br />

establishment and operation <strong>of</strong> the Union were accompanied by the existence <strong>of</strong> serious<br />

organizational and ideological differences among its members. Gradually two groups<br />

were formed in the organization - led by Georgi Hadjiev 9 and led by Ivan Rachev 10 .<br />

Generally, the conflicts between them were focused on the methods <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong><br />

the Union, the ideas for cooperation with other immigrant political circles and ways and<br />

means to combat the communist regime in Bulgaria.<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> political cooperation in the fight against the communist regime in Bulgaria<br />

was the subject <strong>of</strong> many discussion among immigrant anarchists in Paris in the first half<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1952. Part <strong>of</strong> the participants were categorically against cooperation with other<br />

political parties and organizations. There was also controversy between those who speak<br />

in favor <strong>of</strong> cooperation. During the process <strong>of</strong> seeking a common position on<br />

controversial issues, G. Hadjiev presented his project for Declaration on the liberation<br />

struggle <strong>of</strong> the Bulgarian people (the first draft <strong>of</strong> the Declaration he made during his stay<br />

in Constantinople, and after the establishment in Paris he <strong>of</strong>fered it for discussion in the<br />

emigrant organization). Second project is presented by a group <strong>of</strong> anarchists that emerged<br />

around I. Rachev (project was written on February 16 and completed on February 24,<br />

1952). In May 1952, the <strong>of</strong>ficial Declaration was adopted. It contained some <strong>of</strong> Rachev’s<br />

suggestions. "Current methods <strong>of</strong> struggle which are more passive and defensive rather<br />

than proactive and <strong>of</strong>fensive, will not overthrow Bolshevism" was said in the Declaration.<br />

It called for organizing and unifying <strong>of</strong> "all the forces <strong>of</strong> internal resistance, and all<br />

progressive forces <strong>of</strong> Bulgarian emigration." Planned was coordination with agrarians,<br />

socialists, people that rejected Fascism and Bolshevism while each <strong>of</strong> the anti fascist and<br />

anti Bolshevik sectors keep their "full organizational and ideological independence".<br />

Concerning international cooperation, apart from definition <strong>of</strong> the circle <strong>of</strong> anarchist,<br />

socialists, agrarians and “all other progressive anti fascist and anti Bolshevik circles”, it<br />

was stated: “No cooperation with foreign countries that may have colonial, national,<br />

political, economic or social claims upon our country or people in the future”.<br />

Despite his participation in drafting <strong>of</strong> the Declaration, I. Rachev retained overall<br />

critical assessment about the document. He said “In its current form it is not my belief<br />

and action and I'm not satisfied and committed, although it lies at the root <strong>of</strong> my project".<br />

Rachev accused G. Hadjiev that following his "self-seeking, and megalomaniac appetites<br />

for power" he organized "smear campaign" and caused shock not only “upon the friends<br />

who accept the ideas <strong>of</strong> anarchism and cooperation in the name <strong>of</strong> liberty, understanding<br />

the hidden dangers that arise from it” but also upon “those <strong>of</strong> us who are against any kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> cooperation” 12 .<br />

Disputes on cooperation were also intertwined with various opinions on the methods <strong>of</strong><br />

struggle against Bolshevism. I. Rachev and his followers openly blamed the "boss" (G.<br />

Hadjiev) for not seeking cooperation for “any revolutionary struggle against Bolshevism,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!