05.01.2013 Views

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20<br />

Remembrance in Time<br />

the entire building [13]. For more than 10 years, the church had not been repaired, being<br />

left to its fate; therefore it was decided to demolish the building and to use the<br />

construction materials for building other local social-cultural objectives.<br />

Although numerous buildings were destroyed, some archival-file information show that<br />

cult-edifice demolishing was allowed only after noticing their seriously damaged state,<br />

with obvious dangers for the surrounding buildings. In such a situation, the church from<br />

Calfa village, despite the special liquidation commission, having signed a first notice on<br />

its seriously damaged state, the building was not demolished. The church from Calfa was<br />

built in stone and brick, in cruciform plan, the flattened bulb-shaped dome is crowned<br />

with a metallic cross. The building belongs to the steeple-attached churches, with top<br />

arched windows, with octagonal ro<strong>of</strong>, with missing cross on the steeple [14]. The length<br />

<strong>of</strong> the church is 25 m., the width 8 m.<br />

Completely another fate, having reached their dismantling, was shared by the churches<br />

in other villages. This way, the church from Furceni village, Orhei, according to the<br />

appended photograph, does not show obvious signs <strong>of</strong> damage; however, its closure was<br />

called for. Starting from the decisions <strong>of</strong> the commission for the damage state <strong>of</strong> the<br />

buildings and the impossibility <strong>of</strong> their use by the community as cult objectives, the<br />

reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the buildings was insisted upon (through dismantling the towers and<br />

erecting a new ro<strong>of</strong> in slate sheet, usually in 2-4 nuances; removing the crosses,<br />

devastating the interior <strong>of</strong> the churches etc.), thereafter, the use <strong>of</strong> the buildings as barns<br />

for keeping grains [15]. Similarly, the church from Pohărniceni village, Orhei, the<br />

widowed picture <strong>of</strong> the devastated iconostasis being appended in the archival file [16].<br />

The illustrative material appended to the file allows, also in this case, determining the<br />

architectural-constructive particularities <strong>of</strong> the church: the walls erected in rough, not<br />

polished, stone, the ro<strong>of</strong> virtually missing at the moment, with grass in some places etc.<br />

The report <strong>of</strong> the commission <strong>of</strong> expert constructors highlighted that in the church from<br />

Pohărniceni village, the ro<strong>of</strong> was missing; the floors were utterly destroyed; the windows<br />

and doors were broken, destroyed; similarly, the walls present obvious wear traces, are on<br />

the way to collapse; the building plaster suffered as a result <strong>of</strong> the military operations<br />

from 1944. The verdict was the toughest: no opportunity for restoration and repair,<br />

therefore the option was chosen for demolition.<br />

The technical evaluation <strong>of</strong> the church from Selişte village, Orhei, determined the<br />

following parameters <strong>of</strong> the building: total surface <strong>of</strong> 161,6 m.p., the stone foundation is<br />

carved on a clayey soil; it has a depth <strong>of</strong> 1,8 m. the stone walls have a depth <strong>of</strong> 75 cm.,<br />

are practically deformed, they possess numerous cracks and enormous holes [17]. The<br />

Northern and Eastern walls are leant on the vertical, being on way <strong>of</strong> sliding; the church<br />

windows and door are collapsed. The steeple suffered in a percentage <strong>of</strong> 80 %, the ro<strong>of</strong> is<br />

missing, the supportive walls are torn down etc. Consequently, the commission’s report is<br />

as following: the fundamental walls <strong>of</strong> the church are not subject to restoration; the<br />

immediate demolition, especially <strong>of</strong> the steeple building, is necessarily called for.<br />

In 1954, massive demolition also took place in case <strong>of</strong> the monastic churches.<br />

Therewith, the letter <strong>of</strong> the commissioner in the Orthodox Church’s issues, P. Romenski,<br />

submits the demolition <strong>of</strong> the church <strong>of</strong> Hâncu monastic complex, where a rest house is<br />

placed, because “it hinders the formation <strong>of</strong> a park in the centre <strong>of</strong> the house” and the<br />

stones will be used to build a new housing [18]. A special part, as one can see in<br />

promoting the new lifestyle, was played by this very council in the Orthodox Church’s<br />

issues, which decided the demolition, closure and liquidation <strong>of</strong> the churches,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!