05.01.2013 Views

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

Remembrance in Time<br />

parishioners from Mileştii Mici on 8 September 1981, when the director <strong>of</strong> the museum<br />

from Văsieni village, Cutuzov (currently Ialoveni), together with the main curator, drew<br />

up an act, with no. 88, whereby 19 church-patrimony pieces were passed to the balance <strong>of</strong><br />

the so-called museum <strong>of</strong> the Native Land from Văsieni village, “so as to be displayed in<br />

the museum exhibition”. This inventory list included, as follows, three icons <strong>of</strong> Jesus<br />

Christ and <strong>of</strong> God’s Mother (in a satisfactory state), Jesus Christ’s icon (one piece), icons<br />

dedicated to the saints Nicholas, Paul, John, Peter, Andrew, to God Father, to the Holy<br />

Trinity (all in good or satisfactory state), a great chandelier and a baptismal font, both<br />

well kept; four pieces belonging to the liturgical garment, all in a deplorable state [25].<br />

We mention that most churches and monasteries were measured and inventoried,<br />

supplying precious data as regards the liturgical inventory and the church garments, the<br />

holy books, the maintenance state <strong>of</strong> the buildings. Such an inventory referred to Holy<br />

Trinity church from CucuieŃi village, Râşcani [26]. The church was in stone, with a single<br />

altar, the ro<strong>of</strong> in metallic slate, the graveyard surrounded by a stone wall.<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> archival files do not supply also information as regards the building<br />

assessment, their price in certain stages. This way, from the inventory file <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

1946, we determined that the church from Antonovca village, Olăneşti, dedicated to Saint<br />

Nicholas, was in stone, covered with black metal. It was destroyed in a percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

50%. It was assessed to the sum <strong>of</strong> 25 000 roubles.<br />

Another church was closed in that period, namely from Tomai village, Ceadâr-Lunga,<br />

the commission similarly determining the damaged state <strong>of</strong> the building. However, in this<br />

case, two members <strong>of</strong> the commission, engineers-technicians, refused to sign the act on<br />

the demolition <strong>of</strong> the building and reported to the commissioner in the Orthodox Church’s<br />

issues on the satisfactory state <strong>of</strong> the building, on the necessity to make repairs and on the<br />

possibility to further <strong>of</strong>ficiate divine services [27].<br />

The files may be classified apart, referring to the functioning <strong>of</strong> the religious abodes in<br />

the districts to the left <strong>of</strong> the Dniester, which had reached under the dominance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soviet ideology ever since 1918. This way, the church from Lunga village, Dubăsari, was<br />

built in 1897; and, in 1936, the church building was transferred for opening there a<br />

pioneer club. The ro<strong>of</strong> was demolished, the towers were removed, the cross was melt<br />

[28]. In 1942, the church returned to its mission, being functional until 1948. In 1952, the<br />

local kolkhozniks decided, in their meeting, to transfer the desolate church building under<br />

a cereal barn. But, in 1956, the villagers collected above 12 thousand roubles for restoring<br />

the church, <strong>of</strong>ficiating the divine service, also asked a priest’s appointment for the church<br />

in Lunga village.<br />

The church from Nezavertailovca village, Slobozia district, in 1952, according to the<br />

technical certificate, was not used because <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> the building, which reason was<br />

also invoked at closing the building and using it in household purposes. According to the<br />

report <strong>of</strong> the commission for evaluating the situation, mention was made that “the<br />

building does not have the aspect <strong>of</strong> a church, the steeples are missing, the wooden<br />

crosses being placed directly on the old ro<strong>of</strong>; it has not functioned for more than three<br />

years; the yard is in disrepair, the orchard trees, broken; therefore, the parishioner<br />

congregation who would attend this church are missing; the priest and the deacon are not<br />

in the village; only the so-called church starosta works, who did not show empowerment<br />

acts, that is the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting held by the congregation where she was chosen in<br />

this <strong>of</strong>fice; similarly, neither the revision commission, nor the church committee,<br />

consisting in 20 persons, function.” [29].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!