05.01.2013 Views

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

REMEMBRANCE IN TIME - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lora DONCHEVA: The Group <strong>of</strong> Immigrant Anarchists … 35<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the National committee and Dr. G. M. Dimitrov. Nestorov defined the words<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agrarian leader as “small talk”. He summarized the meeting as: “He (Dimitrov)<br />

didn’t tell us anything, but only cried up what the National committee did”. The letter<br />

also reveals Nestorov’s expectations <strong>of</strong> the meeting: “We were just waiting for him to<br />

talk about our common deeds. We dropped him a hint that we are ready for joint<br />

coordinated actions to help our people in the country and release them from the severe<br />

situation...” Nestorov declared that “"it would be great to do something for the martyrs<br />

behind the curtain" 17 . In his memoirs I. Rachev also confirmed the willingness for active<br />

cooperation. He noted that soon after his arrival in Paris in February 1951, the Americans<br />

were interested and wanted to talk to him. I. Rachev was adamant that his answer could<br />

only be positive and said: "... in the interest <strong>of</strong> the struggle for the liberation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bulgarian people, I'm willing to talk to anyone, but I cannot be a whip or a gun in<br />

anyone’s hands" 18 .<br />

These facts, showing serious conflicts between immigrants anarchists, were directly<br />

related to the orientation <strong>of</strong> I. Rachev’s group about organizing an armed group to be<br />

transferred to Bulgaria and join the opposition. They upholded their views in ideological<br />

disputes within the organization revealing the motives for undertaking this difficult and<br />

risky task. As a result <strong>of</strong> the conflict among immigrants anarchists in September 1952<br />

Bogdan Stefanov (one <strong>of</strong> Nestorov’s aliases) and I. Rachev were excluded from the<br />

organization. Despite the common declaration which recognizes the need <strong>of</strong> more<br />

intensive actions in overthrowing the communist regime and the unification <strong>of</strong> all forces<br />

<strong>of</strong> resistance within the country, a decisive step towards deepening the crisis in the<br />

anarchy movement among the emigration was made. According to the facts stated in the<br />

bulletin, "In defense <strong>of</strong> anarchy” as early as August 20, 1952 a letter to the associates<br />

abroad was prepared. This letter reported their exclusion as a result <strong>of</strong> the unanimous<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the organization in Paris. Although they said in the Declaration on the<br />

Bulgarian liberation that they reject any cooperation with the fascists, as a reason for the<br />

exclusion was stated as “dishonest behavior against the organization" consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

cooperation "with the reactionaries and fascists to create a guerrilla movement in<br />

Bulgaria" led by Damian Velchev 19 . Nestorov and Rachev were accused in negotiating<br />

with “Zveno” in October 1951 and signing a declaration <strong>of</strong> cooperation with them in<br />

February 1952. In October 1952 the journal "Our way" published an <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

announcement that "Bogdan Stefanov and I. Rachev are excluded from the organization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the anarchists abroad”. This was because their activities are “incompatible with the<br />

moral and the principles <strong>of</strong> the anarchists”. The same issue reported that a “group <strong>of</strong><br />

ideological friends” observed Doncho Karaivanov’s behaviour in Yugoslavia. They<br />

concluded that “his behavior is not in harmony with the movement he claims he belongs<br />

to” and D. Karaivanov "cannot and should not belong to the same ideological<br />

backgrounds and should no longer engages them" 20 .<br />

The active member <strong>of</strong> the anarchy organization in Paris in 1951 Ivan Drandov said that<br />

the exclusion <strong>of</strong> Rachev and Nestorov is due to their “cooperation with the U.S. Secret<br />

Service at the Embassy in Paris for military training to conduct fight against Bolshevism<br />

in Bulgaria" 21 . Drandov claimed that this happens through a monarchist-fascist <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

without the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the organization.<br />

What was the position <strong>of</strong> the excluded? There is a document titled "Why I oppose the<br />

exclusion <strong>of</strong> Bogdan?" from 1952. In this document I. Rachev reasonably rejected all<br />

allegations against Hr. Nestorov. He criticized the lack <strong>of</strong> consistency among those who

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!