11.07.2015 Views

Fac-simile Scheda Linee di Ricerca - Federalimentare

Fac-simile Scheda Linee di Ricerca - Federalimentare

Fac-simile Scheda Linee di Ricerca - Federalimentare

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Moresi M., Sebastiani I. (2008) Pectin recovery from model solutions using a laboratory-scaleceramic tubular UF membrane module. J Membr Sci 322: 349–359.In this work the feasibility of the recovery of a commercial sample of citrus pectin from model solutions using atemperature- and pressure-controlled bench-top ultrafiltration (UF) plant equipped with a ceramic tubular, 20 kDanominal molecular weight cut-off (NMWCO), UF membrane module, was assessed. Several total recycle tests allowedthe assessment of the effects of transmembrane pressure <strong>di</strong>fference (∆P), feed superficial velocity solute(v S ) and concentration (c BR ) in 26 the ranges of 0.4-4.2 bar, 4-6 m s -1 , and 2.2-30.4 kg m -3 , respectively, on thepermeation flux under a constant process temperature of 50°C. As c BR increased from about 2.2 to 10 kg m-3 thelimiting permeation flux (J P∞ ) almost linearly decreased from 125-195 to about 25-40 dm 3 m -2 h -1 , these values depen<strong>di</strong>ngon v S . For c BR rising from ~10 to 31 kg m -3 , J P∞ was almost constant or slightly tended to decline. Thechange in slope of the plot J P∞ -vs.-log(c BR ) was attributed to the transition from turbulent to laminar regime. Two<strong>di</strong>mensionless empirical regressions among the mo<strong>di</strong>fied Sherwood, Reynolds and Schmidt numbers, valid in thelaminar or turbulent flow regime, enabled the estimation not only of the J P∞ values detected here in the total recyclemode, but also of the permeation fluxes observed by Pritchard et al. (1995) using a polyethersulphone, 37 65-kDa NMWCO, tubular module operating at 45°C, ∆P=2.5 bar and <strong>di</strong>fferent feed superficial velocities (1.3-2.7 ms -1 ) with about 21% deviation. Moreover, such relationships yielded satisfactory simulation of two other independentvalidation tests performed in the batch mode with an average percentage error between the theoretical andexperimental fluxes of 15%.5. Moresi M., Sebastiani I., Wiley D. E. (2009) Experimental Strategy to Assess the MainEngineering Parameters Characterizing So<strong>di</strong>um Alginate Recovery from Model Solutions byCeramic Tubular Ultrafiltration Membrane Modules. J Membr Sci 326: 441-452In this work an experimental procedure was established to assess the main engineering parameters characterisingthe ultrafiltration (UF) recovery of a commercial sample of so<strong>di</strong>um alginate from model solutions, using both alaboratory-scale and a pilot-scale plant equipped with ceramic tubular UF membrane modules.Several total recycle tests were performed in the laboratory-scale plant so as to assess the effects of transmembranepressure <strong>di</strong>fference (∆P), feed superficial velocity (v S ) and solute concentration (c BR ) in the ranges of 0.5-4.5 bar, 4-10 m/s, and 3-22 kg m -3 , respectively, on the permeation flux under a constant process temperature of50°C. As c BR increased from approximately 3 to 7 kg m -3 , the limiting permeation flux (J P∞ ) decreased almostlinearly from 140-320 dm 3 m -2 h -1 (depen<strong>di</strong>ng on v S ) to about 40 dm 3 m -2 h -1 , the latter value being independent ofv S . The change in slope of the plot J P∞ -vs.-log(c BR ) was shown to be due to the transition from turbulent to laminarflow.Two empirical <strong>di</strong>mensionless correlations relating the mo<strong>di</strong>fied Sherwood, Reynolds and Schmidt numbers, vali<strong>di</strong>n the laminar or turbulent flow regime, enabled pre<strong>di</strong>ction of the permeation flux of two independent batch modevalidation tests at high and low initial feed solute concentrations to within

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!