29.06.2013 Views

La généalogie de l'espace comme "champ de bataille ... - Archipel

La généalogie de l'espace comme "champ de bataille ... - Archipel

La généalogie de l'espace comme "champ de bataille ... - Archipel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jackson, Patrick Thad<strong>de</strong>us. 2004. « Whose I<strong>de</strong>ntity? Rhetorical Commonplaces in "American"<br />

Wartime Foreign Policy ». In I<strong>de</strong>ntity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical<br />

Elaborations, sous la dir. <strong>de</strong> Patricia M. Goff et Kevin C. Dunn, p. 169-190. New York:<br />

Palgrave Macmillan.<br />

Jackson, Robert H. 1995. «The Political Theory of International Society». In International<br />

Relations Theory Today, sous la dir. <strong>de</strong> Ken Booth et Steve Smith, 110-28. University Park,<br />

Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.<br />

Jackson, Robert H. 1996. « Is There a Classical International Theory? ». In International<br />

Theory: Positivism and Beyond, sous la dir. <strong>de</strong> Steve Smith, Ken Booth et Marysia<br />

Zalewski, p. 203-18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

James, Paul. 2005. «Theory and Society in the Shadow of Terror ». Alternatives, vol. 30,<br />

p.365-388.<br />

Jameson, Fredric. 2005. «Notes on the Nomos ». The South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 104, no 2,<br />

(printemps), p. 199-204.<br />

Jarvis, D.S.L. 2000. International Relations and the Challenge of Postmo<strong>de</strong>rnism: Defending<br />

the Discipline. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.<br />

Jentleson, Bruce. 2000. « In Pursuit of Praxis: Applying International Relations Theory to<br />

Foreign Policy-Making ». In Being Usefut: Policy Relevance and International Relations<br />

Theory, sous la dir. <strong>de</strong> Miroslav Nincic et Joseph Lepgold, p. 129-49. Ann Arbor, Michigan:<br />

University of Michigan Press.<br />

Jepperson, Ronald 1., Alexan<strong>de</strong>r Wendt et Peter 1. Katzenstein. « Nonns, I<strong>de</strong>ntity, and Culture<br />

in National Security ». In The Culture ofNational Security, Norms and I<strong>de</strong>ntity in World<br />

Politics, sous la dir. <strong>de</strong> Peter 1. Katzenstein, p. 33-75. New York: Columbia University<br />

Press, 1996.<br />

Jervis, Robert. 1994. « Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International<br />

Poltics ». Social Research, vol. 61, no 4 (hiver), p. 853-73.<br />

Jervis, Robert. 1999. « Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the Debate ».<br />

International Security, vol. 24, no 1 (été), p. 42-63.<br />

Jervis, Robert. 2002. « Mutual Assured Destruction ». Foreign Policy, no 133<br />

(novembre/décembre), p. 40-42.<br />

Jervis, Robert. 2003. «Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the Bush Doctrine ». Political Science Quarterly,<br />

vol. 118, no 3 (septembre), p. 365-388.<br />

Jervis, Robert. 2005a. «Why the Bush Docttine Cannot Be Sustained ». Political Science<br />

Quarterly, vol. 120, no 3 (septembre), p. 351-377.<br />

Jervis, Robert. 2005b. American Foreign Policy in a New Era. Londres et New York:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Joffe, Josef. 1995. « Bismarck or Britain? Toward an American Grand Strategy After<br />

Bipolarity ». International Security, vol. 19, no 4 (printemps), p. 94-117.<br />

Joffe, Josef. 2006. überpower: The Imperial Temptation ofAmerica. New York: W. W. Norton.<br />

486

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!