07.12.2012 Aufrufe

Erdfernerkundung - Numerische Physik: Modellierung

Erdfernerkundung - Numerische Physik: Modellierung

Erdfernerkundung - Numerische Physik: Modellierung

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

264 KAPITEL 5. DIE ERWEITERTE PERSPEKTIVE: CAWSES<br />

Abbildung 5.32: Bastille Day event: Particle intensities (left) and ionization rates (right) [189]<br />

time for interaction decreases with increasing speed. dE/dx becomes minimum around the<br />

particles rest energy, afterwards it increases slightly due to relativistic effects (interval 4).<br />

Since this is a general behavior, Fig. 5.31 also can be applied to other particle species as long<br />

as the horizontal axis is scaled in units of the particle’s rest energy (938 MeV in case of the<br />

proton) instead of its energy.<br />

§ 873 The specific energy loss is maximum at low energies (interval 2). In consequence,<br />

the specific energy loss becomes largest close to the end of the particle’s range. Thus the<br />

deposited energy as well as the resulting ion–pair production becomes maximum at the end<br />

of the range, the so-called Bragg peak. For very low energies (interval 1), the Bethe–Bloch<br />

equation is no longer valid: here the main physical processes are collisions between thermal<br />

particles and attachment of the electron to an ion. Both processes are not described by the<br />

Bethe–Bloch equation.<br />

§ 874 The energy loss of a particle along its track can be calculated by numerical integration<br />

of (5.3). Figure 5.32 shows in its right panel the calculated ion–pair production rates (that is<br />

specific energy loss divided by average ionization energy) for three subsequent 12 h intervals,<br />

the first one starting at the time marked by the left horizontal line in the left panel. During<br />

this interval (blue curve), ion–pair production occurs down to about 15 km because particle<br />

energies are rather high (the magenta curve has already acquired its maximum while the<br />

blue curve still is rising). With increasing time (going from blue to red to green), the ion–pair<br />

production rate shifts to higher altitudes because the intensities at higher energies already are<br />

decreasing. In addition, ion–pair production at altitudes around 70 km is increased because<br />

the intensities in the lower proton energies (blue curve in the left panel) still are increasing.<br />

§ 875 For the total model chain, these data now are fed into the model atmosphere. Figure<br />

5.33 shows the modeled (left) and observed (right) NOx production (top) and ozone<br />

depletion (bottom). Although the modeled results tend to overestimate both the NOx production<br />

and the ozone depletion, the overall temporal and spatial pattern is reproduced quite<br />

well.<br />

5.5.2 Monte Carlo Simulation of Atmospheric Ionization<br />

§ 876 Sofar, we have used a direct numerical integration of (5.3). But that approach has two<br />

disadvantages. First of all, the Bethe–Bloch equation is an empirical law derived from observations<br />

at the ground, that is in a standard atmosphere. And secondly, it neither allows to<br />

track the secondary electrons correctly nor to calculate ionization rates for incident electrons.<br />

The reason for this is simple: if a proton ionizes an atom, the collision is between a heavy<br />

2. Juli 2008 c○ M.-B. Kallenrode

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!