04.02.2013 Views

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

❙ 97 ❙<br />

2. Radiation Protection<br />

However, if a l<strong>in</strong>ear relation were to be used to fit the high dose experimental data, as <strong>in</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>e B, the <strong>in</strong>duction at low doses would be very much higher than if only the l<strong>in</strong>ear term<br />

of curve C were used (l<strong>in</strong>e E). Thus, a dose of 2 Gy would have an <strong>in</strong>duction coefficient<br />

of ~ 0.01 for l<strong>in</strong>e B and 0.0004 for l<strong>in</strong>e E.<br />

This has considerable importance <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition of what might constitute a “safe” dose<br />

of radiation. The ratio of these slopes (l<strong>in</strong>e B/l<strong>in</strong>e E) is sometimes used as an estimate of<br />

the reduction factor to be applied to data obta<strong>in</strong>ed at higher doses and high dose‐rates <strong>in</strong><br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g risk estimates for radiation protection.<br />

Information on this critical dose:reponse relation at low doses can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

experimental low LET studied at different dose‐rate. These po<strong>in</strong>ts to the effectiveness of<br />

the repair mechanisms which tend to reduce the biological effect follow<strong>in</strong>g a given dose<br />

delivered at a low dose‐rate, Fig. (2.13). Ultimately the dose‐rate becomes so high that the<br />

damage is irreparable and this puts an upper limit on the <strong>in</strong>itial slope of the dose:response<br />

relation, Fig. (2.12).<br />

Many of the experimental data which underp<strong>in</strong> present knowledge of low dose effects<br />

may have been performed at dose‐rate which were not sufficiently high to reach this limit.<br />

It is therefore present practice to allocate a response function – such as l<strong>in</strong>e D – which<br />

has a slope (= 0.003) approximately between the two extremes (0.0002 and 0.006). This<br />

factor of ~ 2 reduction for the effects of dose‐rate <strong>in</strong> the extrapolation of high to low<br />

doses is referred to as the Dose‐Rate‐Effectiveness Factor (DREF) [9].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!