04.02.2013 Views

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Course</strong> (BPTC) on Nuclear Safety<br />

typically expressed by the requirement that there is a 95% probability at the 95%<br />

confidence level that the fuel rod does not experience a departure from nucleate<br />

boil<strong>in</strong>g (DNB).The DNB correlation used <strong>in</strong> the analysis needs to be based on<br />

experimental data that are relevant to the particular core cool<strong>in</strong>g conditions and<br />

fuel design.<br />

(2) The pressure <strong>in</strong> the reactor coolant and ma<strong>in</strong> steam systems is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed below a<br />

prescribed value (typically 110% of the design pressure).<br />

(3) There is no fuel melt<strong>in</strong>g anywhere <strong>in</strong> the core.<br />

8.3.2. Acceptance Criteria for Non‐LOCA Design Basis Accidents<br />

Traditionally the LOCA have been the focus of the extensive safety assessment efforts<br />

because it has provided a basis for emergency core cool<strong>in</strong>g system (ECCS) design, as<br />

well as site selection and conta<strong>in</strong>ment design. A prescriptive rule related to the LOCA,<br />

used by many other countries, has been developed <strong>in</strong> the United States to demonstrate<br />

that the ECCS performance meets five acceptance criteria for peak clad temperature,<br />

maximum clad oxidation, maximum hydrogen generation <strong>in</strong> the core, preservation of a<br />

coolable core geometry and long term cool<strong>in</strong>g, respectively. Except for those specifically<br />

applied to LOCA, general acceptance criteria for non‐LOCA DBA is presented <strong>in</strong> this<br />

section.<br />

For non‐LOCA DBAs it has to be demonstrated that the design specific eng<strong>in</strong>eered safety<br />

features are sufficiently effective to ensure that:<br />

(4) The radially averaged fuel pellet enthalpy does not exceed the prescribed values<br />

(the values differ significantly among different reactor designs and depend also on<br />

❙ 480 ❙

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!