04.02.2013 Views

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

Regional Basic Professional Training Course in Korea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Course</strong> (BPTC) on Nuclear Safety<br />

Firstly, the chronological sequence <strong>in</strong>cludes all relevant human actions with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

description of the event. Included also is consideration of pre‐event actions, <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the occurrence of the event, as well as the human response to the event,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the recovery actions <strong>in</strong>tended to term<strong>in</strong>ate the event and reach a safe state. The<br />

nature and extent of the human error(s) can be described (was it a s<strong>in</strong>gle error, or were<br />

multiple errors <strong>in</strong>volved?; were the observed human errors dependent or not?; were the<br />

observed human errors recurrent <strong>in</strong> nature?). The description of the event should <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

the tim<strong>in</strong>g and l<strong>in</strong>kage of error‐free and erroneous human actions and system responses,<br />

so that the human behavior is clearly understood. The recovery aspects are very<br />

important, so the description of human actions should <strong>in</strong>clude detection and diagnos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities, decision‐mak<strong>in</strong>g and execution of planned actions, and <strong>in</strong>tra‐team or <strong>in</strong>ter‐team<br />

communication. Tasks carried out <strong>in</strong> parallel by the plant staff when the error(s) occurred<br />

also should be mentioned.<br />

Secondly, situational <strong>in</strong>formation gives an additional explanation of the general context <strong>in</strong><br />

which the event took place. This beg<strong>in</strong>s with a description of the activity contribut<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the <strong>in</strong>itiation of the event or affect<strong>in</strong>g the recovery from the event (e.g. periodic test<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the reactor protection system). Include, if necessary for a good understand<strong>in</strong>g, a short<br />

description of the task <strong>in</strong>volved. Some <strong>in</strong>formation characteriz<strong>in</strong>g the knowledge and<br />

competence of people, and how much the knowledge <strong>in</strong> the crew was complementary<br />

also should be <strong>in</strong>cluded:<br />

Identification of the type of NPP personnel directly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itiation of the<br />

event or contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the event (e.g. reactor operator, I&C technician, etc.);<br />

Operator/technician qualification and precondition<strong>in</strong>g (i.e. previous relevant<br />

experience) or other personal factors (presence of fatigue, stress, etc.);<br />

Characterization of personnel work‐practices (control and <strong>in</strong>dependent verification<br />

of task execution, work habits) and communications.<br />

❙ 724 ❙

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!