04.07.2013 Views

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE CASE FOR STAKEHOLDING 219<br />

campaign for reelection. Under his proposal, every infant born in<br />

Britain would receive a «baby bond» worth up to $750, which would<br />

mature when he or she reached 18. The Treasury would make additional<br />

deposits in each child’s account when he reaches 5, 11 and 16.<br />

Thanks to compound interest, young adults would start life with as<br />

much as $7,500. Obviously, $7,500 isn’t quite $80,000; and the lengthy<br />

18 year transition before the first child gets his stake is much too<br />

long for my taste. 3 Nonetheless, when Blair’s proposal is approved by<br />

parliament, it will mark a great step forward for my project. Once a<br />

stakeholding framework in put in place in Britain, there will be inevitable<br />

agitation for higher stakes and shorter transition periods. So let<br />

us consider some basic principles that should inform future efforts,<br />

using my more ambitious program as a reference point.<br />

First and foremost, stakeholders should be treated as free men and<br />

women. They may use their money for any purpose they see fit – to<br />

start a business or pay for higher education, to buy a house or raise a<br />

family or save for the future. But they must take responsibility for their<br />

choices. Their triumphs and blunders are their own.<br />

At the end of their lives, stakeholders have a special responsibility.<br />

Since the $80,000 was central in starting them off in life, it is only fair<br />

for them to repay it at death if this is financially possible. The stakeholding<br />

fund, in short, will be enriched each year by the ongoing contributions<br />

of the wealthy, and by a final payback at death.<br />

I have chosen $80,000 as the target stake because this is the cost<br />

of a high quality, four year university education in America today.<br />

For the 25 or 30 percent going to university, a key policy question is<br />

whether we will continue with a policy of subsidized tuition now<br />

that each student has the financial capacity to pay his way. This is a<br />

complex issue, and I would be happy to discuss it further in the<br />

question period.<br />

But for now, I want to emphasize a key point: Even if you<br />

ultimately decide that university students should pay most or all of<br />

their stake as tuition, this should serve only as a prelude to further<br />

discussion. After all, stakeholding offers unprecedented opportunities<br />

for the vast majority who <strong>do</strong>n’t go to university. Many of them have<br />

been denied the decent secondary school education that should be every<br />

——————————<br />

3 The most thoughtful effort to adapt stakeholding to the British context is by<br />

David Nissan and Julian Le Grand, A Capital Idea: Start-Up Grants for Young People,<br />

Fabian Society Policy Report No. 49, Feb. 2000 (www.fabian-society.org.uk).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!