Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho
Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho
Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
226<br />
is denied a fair start, how can the rest of us expect them to reciprocate<br />
as the need requires?<br />
*<br />
DIACRÍTICA<br />
I have been painting a pretty picture. But politically speaking, isn’t<br />
stakeholding a pipe dream? In this age of globalization, aren’t<br />
progressives condemned to fight a rear-guard battle on behalf of the<br />
welfare state inherited from the twentieth century? How could we<br />
possibly gain political support for a brand new program that carries<br />
such an enormous pricetag?<br />
Because stakeholding strikes at the heart of the problem that has<br />
pushed progressives to the margin of politics. Quite simply, we have<br />
allowed conservatives to portray progressives as if they were primarily<br />
concerned only with the fate of the bottom twenty percent, and not<br />
with the vast middle class – who have graduated from secondary<br />
school but have not graduated university, and so have failed to share in<br />
the great prosperity gained by the symbol-using classes. Unless and<br />
until we come up with a big policy initiative that speaks to middle<br />
class concerns, they will continue to react skeptically to progressive<br />
initiatives, and with good reason. Since they remain economically<br />
pressed, why should they hand over their hard-earned tax <strong>do</strong>llars to<br />
help those below them?<br />
But stakeholding decisively changes this political equation, and in<br />
a way that makes sense to the average voter. Most of them immediately<br />
turn off the television when some earnest progressive politician begins<br />
to sing the praises of some arcane change in the law regulating social<br />
insurance or child allowances. However well intentioned, such technical<br />
talk suggests to the average voter that he or she is once again being<br />
asked to subsidize the underclass. But $80,000 for each child – now<br />
there is something worth talking about!<br />
Consider the situation of an average American couple of forty year<br />
olds, blessed with two children of ten and twelve. They know full<br />
well that they will be in no position to give their children a stake of<br />
$80,000 apiece in a decade or so. To be sure, they may dream that they<br />
may one day retire with $470,000 and begin to pay a small wealth tax.<br />
But isn’t worth this future tax worth the chance to give your kids<br />
a solid start in life?<br />
The same question is even easier to answer for the vast majority of<br />
Americans in their twenties and thirties – who either have very young<br />
children or are thinking about it. They may regret that stakeholding