04.07.2013 Views

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226<br />

is denied a fair start, how can the rest of us expect them to reciprocate<br />

as the need requires?<br />

*<br />

DIACRÍTICA<br />

I have been painting a pretty picture. But politically speaking, isn’t<br />

stakeholding a pipe dream? In this age of globalization, aren’t<br />

progressives condemned to fight a rear-guard battle on behalf of the<br />

welfare state inherited from the twentieth century? How could we<br />

possibly gain political support for a brand new program that carries<br />

such an enormous pricetag?<br />

Because stakeholding strikes at the heart of the problem that has<br />

pushed progressives to the margin of politics. Quite simply, we have<br />

allowed conservatives to portray progressives as if they were primarily<br />

concerned only with the fate of the bottom twenty percent, and not<br />

with the vast middle class – who have graduated from secondary<br />

school but have not graduated university, and so have failed to share in<br />

the great prosperity gained by the symbol-using classes. Unless and<br />

until we come up with a big policy initiative that speaks to middle<br />

class concerns, they will continue to react skeptically to progressive<br />

initiatives, and with good reason. Since they remain economically<br />

pressed, why should they hand over their hard-earned tax <strong>do</strong>llars to<br />

help those below them?<br />

But stakeholding decisively changes this political equation, and in<br />

a way that makes sense to the average voter. Most of them immediately<br />

turn off the television when some earnest progressive politician begins<br />

to sing the praises of some arcane change in the law regulating social<br />

insurance or child allowances. However well intentioned, such technical<br />

talk suggests to the average voter that he or she is once again being<br />

asked to subsidize the underclass. But $80,000 for each child – now<br />

there is something worth talking about!<br />

Consider the situation of an average American couple of forty year<br />

olds, blessed with two children of ten and twelve. They know full<br />

well that they will be in no position to give their children a stake of<br />

$80,000 apiece in a decade or so. To be sure, they may dream that they<br />

may one day retire with $470,000 and begin to pay a small wealth tax.<br />

But isn’t worth this future tax worth the chance to give your kids<br />

a solid start in life?<br />

The same question is even easier to answer for the vast majority of<br />

Americans in their twenties and thirties – who either have very young<br />

children or are thinking about it. They may regret that stakeholding

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!