Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho
Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho
Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
222<br />
DIACRÍTICA<br />
Doesn’t the $80,000 come too late for all those who have been shortchanged<br />
as children?<br />
My short answer is Yes, and as a consequence, I <strong>do</strong> not wish to<br />
de-emphasize the importance of quality education from an early age.<br />
But I <strong>do</strong> wish to challenge the widespread notion that high quality<br />
education is enough to assure fair equality of opportunity for the next<br />
generation. To the contrary, an «education-only» strategy merely<br />
assures an increasing gap between the symbol-using class at the top of<br />
every Western society and the vast middle class that will look on with<br />
increasing resentment .<br />
To put the point another way, progressives must confront a large<br />
question left after the fall of state socialism in 1989. For all its other<br />
problems, nationalization of the means of production did confront<br />
the question of intergenerational justice. Rather than allowing rich<br />
parents an unfettered liberty to pass their wealth on to their children,<br />
nationalization promised that all citizens would benefit from the<br />
accumulated labors of preceding generations.<br />
Not that this single advantage offset the many disadvantages<br />
of state socialism. I have never been a Marxist, but have devoted myself<br />
instead to the development of a new liberal approach to the social<br />
problems of modern life. But my kind of neo-liberalism is very different<br />
from the «neo-liberalism» that <strong>do</strong>minates the newspaper headlines.<br />
Rather than seeking a return to nineteenth century laissez<br />
faire, I have been attempting been to elaborate a concept of social<br />
justice that serves as the philosophical presupposition for the liberal<br />
demands for individual free<strong>do</strong>m. 4<br />
From this vantage point, the institution of private inheritance<br />
poses obvious problems for a liberal theory of social justice. The liberal’s<br />
celebration of individual free<strong>do</strong>m and market choice simply <strong>do</strong>es<br />
not carry over to the problem posed by the intergenerational transmission<br />
of wealth. After all, none of us chose our parents. Even if rich<br />
parents can make a legitimate claim to the rewards they won in the<br />
marketplace, their children certainly did nothing similar to obtain<br />
large inheritances. One basic way of reconciling the liberal’s commitment<br />
to free<strong>do</strong>m with a concern for social justice is to intervene decisively<br />
to equalize the economic playing field as the next generation<br />
begins adult life.<br />
——————————<br />
4 See my Social Justice in the Liberal State, Yale University Press, 1980.