04.07.2013 Views

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

Revista (PDF) - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222<br />

DIACRÍTICA<br />

Doesn’t the $80,000 come too late for all those who have been shortchanged<br />

as children?<br />

My short answer is Yes, and as a consequence, I <strong>do</strong> not wish to<br />

de-emphasize the importance of quality education from an early age.<br />

But I <strong>do</strong> wish to challenge the widespread notion that high quality<br />

education is enough to assure fair equality of opportunity for the next<br />

generation. To the contrary, an «education-only» strategy merely<br />

assures an increasing gap between the symbol-using class at the top of<br />

every Western society and the vast middle class that will look on with<br />

increasing resentment .<br />

To put the point another way, progressives must confront a large<br />

question left after the fall of state socialism in 1989. For all its other<br />

problems, nationalization of the means of production did confront<br />

the question of intergenerational justice. Rather than allowing rich<br />

parents an unfettered liberty to pass their wealth on to their children,<br />

nationalization promised that all citizens would benefit from the<br />

accumulated labors of preceding generations.<br />

Not that this single advantage offset the many disadvantages<br />

of state socialism. I have never been a Marxist, but have devoted myself<br />

instead to the development of a new liberal approach to the social<br />

problems of modern life. But my kind of neo-liberalism is very different<br />

from the «neo-liberalism» that <strong>do</strong>minates the newspaper headlines.<br />

Rather than seeking a return to nineteenth century laissez<br />

faire, I have been attempting been to elaborate a concept of social<br />

justice that serves as the philosophical presupposition for the liberal<br />

demands for individual free<strong>do</strong>m. 4<br />

From this vantage point, the institution of private inheritance<br />

poses obvious problems for a liberal theory of social justice. The liberal’s<br />

celebration of individual free<strong>do</strong>m and market choice simply <strong>do</strong>es<br />

not carry over to the problem posed by the intergenerational transmission<br />

of wealth. After all, none of us chose our parents. Even if rich<br />

parents can make a legitimate claim to the rewards they won in the<br />

marketplace, their children certainly did nothing similar to obtain<br />

large inheritances. One basic way of reconciling the liberal’s commitment<br />

to free<strong>do</strong>m with a concern for social justice is to intervene decisively<br />

to equalize the economic playing field as the next generation<br />

begins adult life.<br />

——————————<br />

4 See my Social Justice in the Liberal State, Yale University Press, 1980.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!