01.03.2017 Views

ism

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

553<br />

lewdness nor secret intrigues. If anyone rejects faith fruitless is his work and in the Hereafter<br />

he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (all spiritual good). 699700701<br />

699 The question is for food generally, such as is ordinarily "good and pure": in the matter of meat it should be killed with<br />

some sort of solemnity analogous to that of the Takbir. The rules of Islam in this respect being analogous to those of<br />

the People of the Book, there is no objection to mutual recognition, as opposed to meat killed by Pagans with<br />

superstitious rites. In this respect the Christian rule is the same: "That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from<br />

blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication." (Acts, xv. 29). Notice the bracketing of fornication with things<br />

unlawful to eat. (5.5)<br />

5:62 - Many of them dost thou see racing each other in sin and rancor and their eating of things<br />

forbidden. Evil indeed are the things that they do. 771<br />

771 Eating of things forbidden: may be construed in a literal or a figurative sense. From its juxtaposition with sin and<br />

hatred, it is better to construe it in a figurative sense, as referring to their fraudulent misappropriations of other<br />

people's property or trust property. "Eating" is used in v. 66 below in the general sense of enjoyment and happiness.<br />

(5.62)<br />

5:87 - O ye who believe! make not unlawful the good things which Allah hath made lawful for you<br />

but commit no excess: for Allah loveth not those given to excess. 791<br />

791 In pleasures that are good and lawful the crime is excess. There is no merit merely in abstention or ascetic<strong>ism</strong>, though<br />

the humility or unselfishness that may go with ascetic<strong>ism</strong> may have its value. In v. 82, Christian monks are praised for<br />

particular virtues, though here and elsewhere monastic<strong>ism</strong> is disapproved of. Use Allah's gifts of all kinds with<br />

gratitude, but excess is not approved of by Allah. (5.87)<br />

5:88 - Eat of the things which Allah hath provided for you lawful and good: but fear Allah in Whom<br />

ye believe.<br />

5:93 - On those who believe and do deeds of righteousness there is no blame for what they ate (in<br />

the past) when they guard themselves from evil and believe and do deeds of righteousness<br />

(or) again guard themselves from evil and do good. For Allah loveth those who do good. 798<br />

798 There is a subtle symphony in what appears at first sight to be a triple repetition. The relation of such simple<br />

regulations as those of food, or game, or the reverence due to a sacred place or sacred institution, has to be<br />

explained vis-a-vis man's higher duties. Baidhawi is right in classifying such duties under three heads; those due to<br />

Allah, those due from a man to himself (his self-respect), and those due to other creatures of Allah. Or perhaps all<br />

duties have this threefold aspect. The first may be called Believing or Faith; the second, Guarding ourselves from evil,<br />

or Conscience: and the third, doing good or Righteousness. But the simplest physical rules, e.g., those about eating,<br />

cleanliness, etc., if they are good, refer also to the higher aspects. If we eat bad food, we hurt ourselves, we cause<br />

offence to our neighbours, and we disobey Allah. If we have faith and righteousness, are we likely to be wanting in<br />

conscience? If we have conscience and faith, are we likely to fail in righteousness? If we have conscience and<br />

righteousness, what can be their foundation but faith? All three manifest themselves in a willingobedience to Allah,<br />

and love for Him. We realise His love in loving and doing good to His creatures, and our love for Him is meaningless<br />

without such good. (5.93)<br />

6:138 - And they say that such and such cattle and crops are taboo and none should eat of them<br />

except those whom so they say We wish; further there are cattle forbidden to yoke or burden<br />

and cattle on which (at slaughter) the name of Allah is not pronounced; inventions against Allah's<br />

name: soon will He requite them for their inventions. 960961962<br />

960 A taboo of certain foods is sometimes a device of the priesthood to get special things for itself. It has to be enforced<br />

by pretending that the prohibition for others is by the Will of God. It is a lie or invention against God. Most superstitions<br />

are. (6.138)<br />

961 Cattle dedicated to heathen gods may be reserved from all useful work; in that case they are a dead loss to the<br />

community, and they may, besides, do a great deal of damage to fields and crops. (6.138)<br />

962 If meat is killed in the name of heathen gods, it would naturally not be killed by the solemn rite in God's name, by<br />

which alone the killing can be justified for food. See n. 698 to v. 5. (6.138)<br />

6:142 - Of the cattle are some for burden and some for meat. Eat what Allah hath provided for you<br />

and follow not the footsteps of Satan: for he is to you an avowed enemy. 967<br />

967 Superstition kills true religion. We come back to the Arab Pagan superstitions about cattle for food. The horse is not<br />

mentioned, because horse flesh was not an article of diet and there were no superstitions about it. Sheep and goats,<br />

camels and oxen were the usual sources of meat. Sheep and goats were not used as beasts of burden, but camels<br />

(of both sexes) were used for carrying burdens, and oxen for the plough, though cows were mainly used for milk and<br />

meat. The words "some for burden and some for meat" do not differentiate whole species, except that they give you<br />

the first two and the last two categories. (6.142)<br />

Go to UP<br />

553

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!