12.07.2015 Views

The Science of Therapeutics - Classical Homeopathy Online

The Science of Therapeutics - Classical Homeopathy Online

The Science of Therapeutics - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Full text <strong>of</strong> "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Science</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapeutics: According to the Principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Homeopathy</strong>"Page 14 <strong>of</strong> 653bility in its favor. <strong>The</strong> treacherous stains on the linen are, <strong>of</strong>a source <strong>of</strong> great anxiety to the sufferers, and it is not to be wdered if they desire to be freed from their distress. Finally, exbations will occur during gleet, which, if they do not result inattack <strong>of</strong> acute gonorrhoea, cause some pain at urinating and anincreased, whitish discharge. Such exacerbations sometimes set inafter slight colds, after drinking beer or wine, or even after coGleet is no guarantee against a fresh infection, but this may absit instead <strong>of</strong> rendering it more inveterate.Among the sequelse which may involve the bladder, prostategland, etc., we note more especially strictures <strong>of</strong> the urethra. Ocause <strong>of</strong> stricture may be a contracting cicatrix in the urethra,which case the bougie is alone capable <strong>of</strong> affording help. Or thestricture may depend upon infiltration and subse juent callous hypertrophy <strong>of</strong> the tissue surrounding the urethra, in which case itsometimes felt externally like a hard, elongated swelling.We shall devote a few lines to the so-called gonorrhoeal diseaseand gonorrhoea! metastases. Hahnemann speaks <strong>of</strong> two kinds <strong>of</strong>gonorrhoea, a benign kind which may be regarded as a local diseas<strong>of</strong> the urethra, and another kind depending upon the sycosic contagium. Ilartmann observes, that the two kinds cannot well be distinguished in a given case. It can scarcely be supposed that condlomata constitute a distinct phenomenon in gonorrhoea, which mayrun its course as completely and rapidly with, as without them. Iblennorhoeic condylomata constituted a specific product, ophthalmblennorhoea ought to be a result <strong>of</strong> the sycosic miasm, since condlomatous growths likewise occur in the former disease. Be this asit may, it is <strong>of</strong> very little consequence whether there are two ki<strong>of</strong> gonorrhoea, for in practice we cannot make this distinction evif we would. It is an established fact, that the gonorrhoea! bear6 Diseases <strong>of</strong> the Male Sexual Organs.resemblance to the syphilitic contagium, by which is meant that tformer does not develop, as a more or less regular consequence, aconstitutional malady, and that it acts like the contagium <strong>of</strong> theophthalmic blennorhoea and similarly to the contagium <strong>of</strong> smallscarlatina, etc. Or shall we consider these contagia as syphiliticause their respective diseases sbmetimes leave severe constitutiderangements behind them? In our opinion, a gonorrhoeal epidemicdisease neither exists, nor is it at all possible. At all events,intense gonorrhceal infection, including, <strong>of</strong> course, the absurd min which it is <strong>of</strong>ten treated^ gives rise to a constitutional diseis wrong to hold the gonorrhoea responsible for it, any more thanthat it may have acted as the exciting cause or the spark that mahave ignited the accumulated combustible material. This view issupported by a number <strong>of</strong> analogies, whereas the other view requirfor its pro<strong>of</strong> a mass <strong>of</strong> speculative hypotheses. Let the partisansthis doctrine be invited to point to a case <strong>of</strong> gonorrhoeal constitional disease. If such a thing did at all exist, it certainly cabe difficult to pick out a dozen cases among the tens <strong>of</strong> thousandthat have been treated for gonorrhoea. And then it would be incumbent upon them to show that in those cases the gonorrhoea wasa simple blennorrhoea and not caused by a syphilitic ulcer. Hartmann has not made this distinction, nor is it probable that Hahnemann did so.http://www.archive.org/stream/sciencetherapeu00kafkgoog/sciencetherapeu00kafkgoog_djvu.txt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!