12.07.2015 Views

C. Wiebes - Intelligence en de oorlog in Bosnië 1992-1995. De rol van de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten - Engels

C. Wiebes - Intelligence en de oorlog in Bosnië 1992-1995. De rol van de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten - Engels

C. Wiebes - Intelligence en de oorlog in Bosnië 1992-1995. De rol van de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten - Engels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218The Americans also profited from <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce from NATO member states through the backdoor. At that time the US G<strong>en</strong>eral Hayd<strong>en</strong> received Sig<strong>in</strong>t as Director <strong>Intellig<strong>en</strong>ce</strong> of the US EuropeanCommand (EUCOM), an American national command outsi<strong>de</strong> the NATO l<strong>in</strong>es of communication. Inthis capacity he was supported by a team of 60 Sig<strong>in</strong>t experts from the NSA, that operated fromStuttgart, and from the Regional Sig<strong>in</strong>t Operations C<strong>en</strong>ter at the US base Fort Gordon, which had thespecial task of provid<strong>in</strong>g Sig<strong>in</strong>t support for this US EUCOM. This <strong>en</strong>abled the Americans to comb<strong>in</strong>etheir own <strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>in</strong>tercepts with the <strong>in</strong>formation gathered for them by NATO memberstates. An American <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce officer stated with regard to this: ‘if the NSA knew, Stuttgart wouldknow’. 1160 All th<strong>in</strong>gs consi<strong>de</strong>red, the Americans had consi<strong>de</strong>rable <strong>in</strong>formation available to them fromSig<strong>in</strong>t, but the exchange with other countries was limited. The next question is whether this also appliedto the Sig<strong>in</strong>t shared with the UNPROFOR staffs <strong>in</strong> Sarajevo and Zagreb. This seems <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>ed to be thecase: the American and other Sig<strong>in</strong>t ag<strong>en</strong>cies shared some <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce with UNPROFOR.In 1995 the Head of the <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce staff <strong>in</strong> Zagreb was the Swedish officer Colonel Jan-IngeSv<strong>en</strong>sson. He was assisted by his compatriot Lieut<strong>en</strong>ant Colonel Ingmar Ljunggr<strong>en</strong>, while the <strong>de</strong>puty<strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce officer was an American from the US Navy, Comman<strong>de</strong>r Morgan. The Swe<strong>de</strong>s had national<strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>put at their disposal, and were also supplied with <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce by the Americans, Fr<strong>en</strong>chand British. The Fr<strong>en</strong>ch and British <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce was rated as ‘good’. One should bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d here thatSwed<strong>en</strong> was not an ‘official’ member of NATO. Sometimes Sv<strong>en</strong>sson and Ljunggr<strong>en</strong> received bothtactical and strategic Sig<strong>in</strong>t, such as fragm<strong>en</strong>ts of telephone calls betwe<strong>en</strong> G<strong>en</strong>erals Mladic and Perisic.Brief<strong>in</strong>gs were also held on the basis of Sig<strong>in</strong>t. However, they also rated Hum<strong>in</strong>t as an important1161source.Another UNPROFOR staff member confirmed that the <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce staff <strong>in</strong> Zagreb sometimesreceived tactical military Sig<strong>in</strong>t. These <strong>in</strong>tercepts were also occasionally translated <strong>in</strong>to Fr<strong>en</strong>ch forJanvier, partly so that the <strong>in</strong>terpreter did not th<strong>en</strong> have to translate the English text out loud and thusto prev<strong>en</strong>t the Croatian <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce service from eavesdropp<strong>in</strong>g on this. 1162 The fact that Janvier hadthis <strong>in</strong>formation has already be<strong>en</strong> <strong>de</strong>alt with <strong>in</strong> Chapter 1.Some members of the <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce staff <strong>in</strong> Zagreb also had access to valuable Sig<strong>in</strong>t relat<strong>in</strong>g toBihac. This was obta<strong>in</strong>ed through the LOCE system and national channels. In addition, <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ceofficers <strong>in</strong> Zagreb oft<strong>en</strong> monitored the communications traffic betwe<strong>en</strong> local comman<strong>de</strong>rs andSarajevo, and they are ev<strong>en</strong> said to have monitored the regular telephone calls betwe<strong>en</strong> their1163comman<strong>de</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> Zagreb and Sarajevo. Members of the UNMO <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce staff <strong>in</strong> Zagreb confirmedthat they too had Sig<strong>in</strong>t at their disposal. This is said to have orig<strong>in</strong>ated from monitor<strong>in</strong>g stations nearNaples. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a critical situation <strong>in</strong> Bihac <strong>in</strong> November 1994 the UNMO officers work<strong>in</strong>g there at thetime received copies of <strong>in</strong>tercepts of communication betwe<strong>en</strong> the Comman<strong>de</strong>r <strong>in</strong> Chief of the ABiH,Rasim <strong>De</strong>lic, and the ABiH G<strong>en</strong>eral Dudakovic.What Sig<strong>in</strong>t was exchanged regard<strong>in</strong>g the attack on Srebr<strong>en</strong>ica?In 1995 too, foreign monitor<strong>in</strong>g services managed to <strong>in</strong>tercept the communications traffic of the ABiHComman<strong>de</strong>r <strong>in</strong> Chief Rasim <strong>De</strong>lic. An <strong>in</strong>terviewed UNMO officer therefore won<strong>de</strong>red: ‘Why didn’t wereceive this sort of <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the fall of Srebr<strong>en</strong>ica?’ 1164 The probable reason for this wasthat this Com<strong>in</strong>t did not <strong>in</strong> fact exist, because the various Western services did not have good Sig<strong>in</strong>tcoverage of Eastern Bosnia and thus were not able to monitor this area <strong>in</strong>t<strong>en</strong>sively.There are further <strong>in</strong>dications that there was no Sig<strong>in</strong>t that directly <strong>in</strong>dicated that the attack onSrebr<strong>en</strong>ica was imm<strong>in</strong><strong>en</strong>t. A few days before the attack the <strong>De</strong>puty Head of the <strong>in</strong>tellig<strong>en</strong>ce section <strong>in</strong>1160 The head of the Balkan Sig<strong>in</strong>t unit <strong>in</strong> Stuttgart at that time was Pat Donahue. Confid<strong>en</strong>tial <strong>in</strong>terviews (6), (13) and (54).1161 Interviews with Jan-Inge Sv<strong>en</strong>sson and Ingmar Ljunggr<strong>en</strong>, 04/11/99.1162 Confid<strong>en</strong>tial <strong>in</strong>formation (35).1163 Confid<strong>en</strong>tial <strong>in</strong>terview (45).1164 Confid<strong>en</strong>tial <strong>in</strong>terview (44).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!