12.07.2015 Views

C. Wiebes - Intelligence en de oorlog in Bosnië 1992-1995. De rol van de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten - Engels

C. Wiebes - Intelligence en de oorlog in Bosnië 1992-1995. De rol van de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten - Engels

C. Wiebes - Intelligence en de oorlog in Bosnië 1992-1995. De rol van de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten - Engels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

305Albright shows the photosOn 10 August, Albright produced the photos of the disturbed ground where the executed m<strong>en</strong> wereburied. 1669 They were also passed on to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>De</strong>f<strong>en</strong>ce by the US Embassy <strong>in</strong> The Hague. 1670If the Dutch Governm<strong>en</strong>t wanted to see more photos or more <strong>de</strong>tailed photos th<strong>en</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton wouldbe prepared to look favourably on this request. 1671 The DPKO did not, however, receive the sametreatm<strong>en</strong>t because, on the same day, all that Annan’s advisor, Tharoor, received was a copy ofAlbright’s speech. He did not get the photos because of ‘technical difficulties’. 1672 He would get themon 15 August through a separate brief<strong>in</strong>g. DPKO was also shown a sketch of a classified photo of awi<strong>de</strong>r area one kilometre north of Nova Kasaba. The actual photo was not released. 1673On 18 August, M<strong>in</strong>ister Voorhoeve received an answer to the memo he had s<strong>en</strong>t two weeksbefore. In the meantime, the Albright photos had be<strong>en</strong> published. The US military attaché also hadsome classified <strong>de</strong>tailed imagery of the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Srebr<strong>en</strong>ica, but they could betray the technologicalpossibilities of the satellite. For this reason, his governm<strong>en</strong>t had <strong>in</strong>structed him not to release them. Butit would not object if they were studied, analysed and <strong>in</strong>terpreted by governm<strong>en</strong>t photo analysts at the<strong>De</strong>f<strong>en</strong>ce Crisis Managem<strong>en</strong>t C<strong>en</strong>tre (DCBC). The Royal Netherlands Air Force was therefore asked tomake a team of photo analysts available on 21 August. 1674On the same day, American repres<strong>en</strong>tatives showed the strictly classified satellite photos toanalysts of the Air Force. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the week<strong>en</strong>d Joup Schour<strong>en</strong> and his colleagues were allowed to brieflyanalyse the photos at the DCBC un<strong>de</strong>r the watchful eye of an US colonel. Schour<strong>en</strong> would have likedto have <strong>in</strong>spected them at the Volkel air base, but this was not allowed. The Americans did not offertheir own <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the photos. Standard <strong>de</strong>tails were also miss<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the type of film,the time, the height and the focal distance of the l<strong>en</strong>s for calculat<strong>in</strong>g the scale of the photos. The onlyavailable <strong>in</strong>formation was the date and the position. After a short analysis the photos had to bereturned directly to the US Embassy. 1675However, an erroneous observation is presumably ma<strong>de</strong> here by Schour<strong>en</strong>. Time, date andgeographic co-ord<strong>in</strong>ates are standard annotations for any sort of imagery, but altitu<strong>de</strong> and focal l<strong>en</strong>gthare <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itely not. This observation clearly comes from a TACRECCE person (which Schour<strong>en</strong> was),where such <strong>in</strong>formation is normally imbed<strong>de</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the photo with a matrix arrangem<strong>en</strong>t. It does notapply to UAV imagery, U2 imagery, or any sort of satellite imagery. 1676One <strong>in</strong>terpretation of Albright’s satellite photos was as follows: two groups of ‘possible’prisoners were discernible on a football pitch near Nova Kasaba, 19 kilometres west of Bratunac andSrebr<strong>en</strong>ica and five kilometres south of Konjevic Polje: one of approximately 100 persons and one ofapproximately 500 persons. Both groups were seated on the ground and surroun<strong>de</strong>d by tw<strong>en</strong>ty or sos<strong>en</strong>try posts. There were five vehicles at the <strong>en</strong>trance to the football pitch. On the photos Schour<strong>en</strong>saw a football pitch with guards, space for load<strong>in</strong>g people onto transport, people (some of whom werekneel<strong>in</strong>g), two bulldozers and two T-55 tanks with a bulldozer bla<strong>de</strong>, a hole <strong>in</strong> the ground, buses andtrucks.He could also see a British Warrior <strong>in</strong> UN colours driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a bus convoy. It was not a DutchAPC; the British had lost a few Warriors to the VRS earlier <strong>in</strong> the war. Schour<strong>en</strong> counted 600 m<strong>en</strong>kneel<strong>in</strong>g at an assembly po<strong>in</strong>t. There was also a camp <strong>en</strong>closed by f<strong>en</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g, which rem<strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>d him of1669 ‘US Reveals Photographs of Appar<strong>en</strong>t Mass Grave’, International Herald Tribune, 10/08/95 and ‘Up to 2,700 MassacredBy Serbs, UN is Told, International Herald Tribune, 11/08/95.1670 MoD, DCBC, Box 61.US Army Attaché to Comman<strong>de</strong>r Hil<strong>de</strong>r<strong>in</strong>k, 11/08/95.1671 MoD, DJZ. Perman<strong>en</strong>t NATO repres<strong>en</strong>tative to Foreign M<strong>in</strong>istry, No. 1147, 11/08/95.1672 UNNY, DPKO. Annan to Akashi, No. 2686, 11/08/95.1673 Confid<strong>en</strong>tial Collection (8), Annan to Akashi, No. MSC 2720, 15/08/95 plus a copy of photos.1674 MoD, DS, No. DE01107, Act<strong>in</strong>g Comman<strong>de</strong>r of <strong>De</strong>f<strong>en</strong>ce Staff Schout<strong>en</strong> to M<strong>in</strong>ister Voorhoeve, No. S95/061/3269,18/08/95.1675 Interview with J. Schour<strong>en</strong>, 04/12/99 and J.J.C. Voorhoeve, 13/03/97.1676 Confid<strong>en</strong>tial <strong>in</strong>formation (80) and confid<strong>en</strong>tial <strong>in</strong>terview (54).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!