25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eing given to the formulation <strong>of</strong> social objectives. A key question is<br />

whether those objectives should be internalized within the <strong>fisheries</strong><br />

management strategies or remain externalized and devolved to other policy<br />

sectors (social policy, regional policy, etc.). The paper explores the scope<br />

for incorporating social objectives in alternative management strategies and<br />

develops an agenda for policy related social science research. It draws upon<br />

the proceedings <strong>of</strong> an European Union funded international workshop held in<br />

Brussels in May, 1994.<br />

Criddle, Keith R., and Arthur M. Havenner (1989). "Forecasting Halibut<br />

Biomass Using System Theoretic Time-Series Methods." American<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Economics, (May):422-431.<br />

A new procedure introduced by Masanao Aoki uses the ideas <strong>of</strong> linear<br />

systems theory to identify and estimate time-series models. A slightly<br />

modified version <strong>of</strong> this procedure is used to forecast halibut biomass in<br />

total and by regulatory area and subarea, and the out-<strong>of</strong>-sample forecasts are<br />

evaluated for eight years. All models produce highly accurate forecasts <strong>of</strong><br />

biomass, with errors well within the bounds required for setting catch limits<br />

in the following year.<br />

Cronin, Francis J. (1982). Valuing Nonmarket Goods Through Contingent<br />

Markets. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by<br />

Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratory.<br />

To estimate the value <strong>of</strong> public good externalities and thus determine<br />

their efficient levels <strong>of</strong> production, several researchers have recommended the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> interview techniques. In fact, contingent market valuations <strong>of</strong><br />

externalities have recently been employed in studies <strong>of</strong> recreational activity<br />

and visibility. Furthermore, because <strong>of</strong> the limitations inherent in other<br />

techniques and society's increased concern with allocation efficiency,<br />

contingent market valuation is likely to become an important tool in<br />

determining the types and levels <strong>of</strong> public goods produced.<br />

Despite the recent spate <strong>of</strong> studies employing contingent markets,<br />

uncertainties remain regarding the existence and impacts <strong>of</strong> biases <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

associated with this technique. Included among these are hypothetical bias,<br />

strategic bias, information bias, and interviewer bias. If the results <strong>of</strong><br />

contingent market valuation are to be credible, the uncertainties surrounding<br />

these biases must be resolved. If no biases exist, no actions need be taken;<br />

if biases do exist, however, methods to mitigate their impacts or to estimate<br />

their influences must be developed.<br />

This paper estimates the extent and significance <strong>of</strong> three biases<br />

associated with contingent market analysis - strategic bias, information bias,<br />

and interviewer bias. The contingent market analyzed is that for improved<br />

water quality. The values households place on improved water quality are<br />

obtained from a random sample <strong>of</strong> almost 2,000 households in Washington, D.C.<br />

metropolitan reach <strong>of</strong> the Potomac River. Thus, the analysis also provides<br />

information necessary to select the optimal level <strong>of</strong> water quality.<br />

The findings indicate that the value attached to improved water quality<br />

is substantially higher than that estimated in prior studies. Perhaps <strong>of</strong> more<br />

general importance, the findings support the hypothesis that respondents<br />

engage in strategic behavior. Respondents who were given incentives to bias<br />

their revealed value downward were found to have mean bids significantly lower<br />

than households who were given incentives to bias their revealed values<br />

upward. In addition, statistically significant evidence supporting the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> both information and interviewer bias was found.<br />

Crookshank, Steven L. (1991). "The Economics <strong>of</strong> Wetland Valuation."<br />

Report prepared for the National Marine Fisheries Service.<br />

1 4 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!