25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

on the optimal rate <strong>of</strong> exploitation becomes ambiguous. The paper examines the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> the discount rate with and without stock-dependent harvesting costs.<br />

This leads on to the question o how the risk <strong>of</strong> extinction under free access<br />

depends on the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> unit harvesting costs, or catch per unit <strong>of</strong><br />

effort, to the size <strong>of</strong> the exploited stock.<br />

Finally, stochastic fishery models are briefly considered. The main<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> the paper is to demonstrate that deterministic fishery<br />

models may give poor guidance for managing the stochastic <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

real world, even if risk neutrality and constant prices are assumed. To<br />

demonstrate this as clearly as possible, the unit cost <strong>of</strong> harvesting is<br />

assumed to be constant, implying that the optimal rate <strong>of</strong> exploitation is<br />

constant in a deterministic model. First, we consider the simple case <strong>of</strong><br />

time-invariant stochastic catch quotas (no population dynamics), and<br />

demonstrate how optimal catch capacity depends on the cost <strong>of</strong> investing in the<br />

necessary equipment. Then we consider population dynamics, where expected<br />

future catch quotas depend on how much is being taken presently. Optimal<br />

catch capacity depends on the cost <strong>of</strong> investment in this case as well, but the<br />

derivation <strong>of</strong> optimal harvesting and investment policies becomes more<br />

complicated.<br />

Hannesson, R. (1988). "Fixed or Variable Catch Quotas? The Importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Population Dynamics and Stock Dependent Costs." Marine<br />

Resource Economics, 5(4):415-432.<br />

This article considers two questions concerning fluctuations in fish<br />

stocks and catches: are they possible beneficial and would fishery managers<br />

opt for a strategy that enhances stock or catch quota variability or both?<br />

For this analysis, three models are followed: in the first, variations in<br />

stock abundance are stochastic with no population dynamics; in the second, the<br />

stock in a certain time period depends on a stochastic recruitment to the<br />

stock and survivors from the previous time period; and the third is a year<br />

class model that has more complicated population dynamics but is more<br />

realistic. The article implicitly assumes that property rights exist by using<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it maximizing mathematical techniques.<br />

Hannesson, Rognvaldur (1993). "Enclosure <strong>of</strong> the Commons: Two<br />

Paradoxes." Presented at the International Conference on<br />

Fisheries Economics, Os, Norway, May 26-28.<br />

de Meza and Gould (1992) show that the rent from enclosing a free access<br />

resource may, at the wage rate prior to enclosure, be positive while the<br />

social benefit is negative. Hence there may be an incentive to privatize a<br />

common resource even when this is not warranted for reasons <strong>of</strong> efficiency.<br />

Books and Heijdra (1990) have criticized Buchanan (1980) for a similar<br />

approach when demonstrating that the potential benefits <strong>of</strong> enclosing the<br />

commons may be dissipated through rent seeking. In this paper we show that de<br />

Meza and Gould's conclusion that the rent from enclosure will be higher than<br />

the social benefit at the free access wage rate still holds when there is a<br />

real cost <strong>of</strong> the enclosure and diminishing returns in both sectors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economy. It may, however, happen that the resource rent after enclosure is<br />

negative while the social benefit <strong>of</strong> enclosure is positive. Hence we might<br />

end up in the curious situation that neither free access nor enclosure is an<br />

equilibrium.<br />

Hannesson, Rognvaldur (1993). "Fishing Capacity and Harvest Rules."<br />

Marine Resource Economics, 8(2):133-143.<br />

In this note we consider the choice <strong>of</strong> optimum fishing capacity for fish<br />

stocks that vary at random. In models with stochastic variations <strong>of</strong> fish<br />

2 8 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!