25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This report provides current information on the <strong>economics</strong> <strong>of</strong> owning and<br />

operating a shrimp vessel in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico for the period 1971-1975. The<br />

break-even annual shrimp catches with various ex-vessel shrimp prices for<br />

1971, 1973, 1974, and 1975 are estimated and the expected cost and returns in<br />

1975 are evaluated.<br />

Griffin, Wade L., Deborah Tolman, and Chris Oliver (1993). "Economic<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> TEDs on the Shrimp Production Sector." Society and<br />

Natural Resources, 6:291-308.<br />

The economic impact <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> the Turtle Excluder Device (TEDs)<br />

used in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico to control the numbers <strong>of</strong> turtles caught in shrimp<br />

trawl nets is analyzed. This is a major concern to the shrimp fishing economy<br />

due to the potential loss <strong>of</strong> shrimp. A simulation modeling technique is used<br />

which estimates the changes in landings, revenues, costs, and the economic<br />

rents. A base scenario in which no TEDs are used is compared with five<br />

different scenarios where the TED is used by vessels in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico.<br />

The analysis was based on a single year impact. The implementation <strong>of</strong> the TED<br />

comes with costs to the vessel owners and crew in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico. Since<br />

the implementation <strong>of</strong> the TEDs does cause negative rent, it is a certainty,<br />

all other things remaining equal, that some vessel owners and crew will leave<br />

the industry. The number to leave the industry will depend on how effective<br />

they are at learning to use the TED effectively.<br />

Griffin, Wade L., John Ward, and James Nance (1996). "A Bioeconomic<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Existing and Proposed Management Alternatives to<br />

Control Sea Turtle Mortality In the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico Shrimp<br />

Fishery." Presentation, Symposium on the Consequences and<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> Fisheries Bycatch, the American Fisheries Society<br />

Annual Meeting, Dearborn Michigan, August 26-29, 13 pp.<br />

The General Bioeconomic Fishery Simulation Model was used to examine the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> four proposed management alternatives to reduce sea turtle<br />

bycatch in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico shrimp fishery.<br />

Griffin, Wade L., John Ward, and James Nance (1996). "A Bioeconomic<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Management Alternatives to Control Sea Turtle<br />

Mortality In the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico Shrimp Fishery." Proceedings,<br />

Fisheries Bycatch: Consequences and Management, Alaska Sea Grant<br />

Report 97-02: 57-62, Dearborn Michigan, August 27-28, 13 pp.<br />

The General Bioeconomic Fishery Simulation Model was used to examine the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> four proposed management alternatives to reduce sea turtle<br />

bycatch in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico shrimp fishery.<br />

Griffin, Wade L., Newton J. Wardlaw, and John P. Nichols (1976).<br />

"Economic and Financial Analysis <strong>of</strong> Increasing Costs in the Gulf<br />

Shrimp Fleet." Fishery Bulletin, 74(2):301-309.<br />

The 115 Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico shrimp vessels used in this study were grouped<br />

into classes I (larger vessels) through V (smaller vessels) based on their<br />

type <strong>of</strong> construction, length <strong>of</strong> keel, and index <strong>of</strong> effort. In 1973, class II<br />

vessels were the only vessels able to register a positive return to owner's<br />

labor and management, $560; the other four classes registered negative<br />

returns. The payback period occurred during the eighth year due to the sale<br />

<strong>of</strong> the vessels in classes II, III, and V, whereas payback did not occur for<br />

classes I and IV. A positive rate <strong>of</strong> return on investment was experienced by<br />

the vessels in classes II, III, and V in the amount <strong>of</strong> 13.21, 2.65, and 2.63%,<br />

respectively. The internal rate <strong>of</strong> return on investment was negative for<br />

2 5 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!